ABSTRACT
Objective: To find out the antimicrobial resistance pattern in A. baumannii isolates from sputum samples of hospitalized patients
in ICUs and determine the incidence rates
of most common OXA-type carbapenemases, NDM-1, KPC and Class1
integrons among A. baumannii isolates.
Methods:
This retrospective study included a total of 50 A. baumannii isolates recovered
from sputum specimens, obtained from adult ICU patients at King Hussein Medical
Center (KHMC, Amman, Jordan) over a period of 18-months from
February 2017 to August 2018. All isolates were identified and tested for
susceptibility against 13 antibiotics by VITEK 2 Automated
Microbiology System using gram negative ID card and
“VITEK 2 AST–N233 and AST-XNO5 susceptibility cards according to CLSI
guidelines (2018). Genomic and plasmid DNA were extracted. PCR tests were used
to determine the presence of six types of class D oxacillinases, one type of
class A carbapenemases, one type of class B metallo β lactamases, and Class 1
Integron among MDR isolates.
Results:
All 50 isolates were MDR, including 100% resistance to cephalosporins,
ciprofloxacin, aztreonem, piperacillin/tazobactum, 94%-98% to carbapenemes and
2% to colistin. All isolates carried blaOXA-51 and 94% were
positive for blaOXA-23, while blaOXA-24, blaOXA-58, blaOXA-143 and blaOXA-235 were
positive in smaller percentages (4%-12%). The isolates also were positive for
NDM-1, KPC and Class 1 Integron at rates of 26%, 22% and 86%, respectively.
Conclusions:
This study concludes that respiratory tract colonization must be taken seriously
as a source of bacteraemia with aggressive MDR A. baumannii. In
addition, A. baumannii are able to acquire a lot of genetic
resistance factors which will cause difficulties in treatment and rapid
transmission in hospitals, Therefore, healthcare facilities should follow
infection control measures
to
control and stop the transmission of MDR organisms.
Keywords: Acinetobacter
baumannii, MDR, PCR, bla OXA, Class1 Integron.
RMS April 2023; 30 (1):
10.12816/0061487
Introduction
Acinetobacter
baumannii, commonly found in wet hospital environments, can colonize
different body parts of patients due to its ability to resist dryness for a few
weeks. In addition it cannot be easily eradicated with disinfectants and
ultraviolet methods and can accommodate nutritional starvation in
moist environments.(1-4)
Bacteriologically, A.baumannii belongs to the Moraxellaceae
family, which includes gram-negative coccobacilli and has the following
characteristics: strictly aerobic, nonmotile, glucose and lactose
non-fermenting, catalase positive, oxidase negative and urease negative (1,5).
The
precise natural reservoir of this organism is still unidentified. It can stay
alive for a long duration in soil, waste water and hospital water system and can hold up in
temperatures between −20 to 44 °C and neutral pH for 5 months (6).
The Acinetobacter species
is considered to be important as it is associated with frequent hospital
outbreaks (7). It can be isolated and identified through culturing on blood and
MacConkey agar for at least 24 h incubation at room temperature and up to 40 °C
(7).
A.baumannii
is a special opportunistic
pathogenic organism due to its ability to develop rapid changes in genetic
contents, leading to acquisition of multiple and extensive antimicrobial
resistance genes (8-9).
Moreover,
the genetic characteristics of A. baumannii strains are
responsible for antibiotic resistance (10) and exhibit wide differences in biological
characteristics related to biofilm formation, cell capsule development,
adherence, invasion, iron uptake, or penicillin binding protein modifications
(11). All of these characteristics enhance the spread of resistant isolates
among the patients in clonally pattern (4).
A.
baumannii strains cause a wide spectrum
of infections including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), blood stream
infection, urinary tract infection, traumatic wound and burn wound infection,
meningitis and endocarditis (12).
Most
of these infections are developed after prolonged period of hospitalization or
usage of mechanical ventilation and in patients had a previous history of
antibiotics (1, 13).
VAP
accounts for 86% of hospital-acquired infections in seriously ill patients. Acinetobacter species accounts for 8.4% of VAP and 2.2% of catheter-associated
bloodstream infections in the USA (14, 15).
According to a recent study in the USA, most Acinetobacter isolates
(57.6%) were obtained from the sputum, followed by blood (23.9%) and wounds
(9.1%). In addition, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii accounted for 65%
of all pneumonias in USA and Europe (16) and had a mortality rate of 73% (17).
Almost
all studies concluded that multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii infections
are difficult to treat, spread rapidly among hospitalized patients, and have
high morbidity and mortality due to blood sepsis or VAP (18, 1, 19-21).
The
present study describes the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of
antibiotic-resistant A. baumannii isolates
obtained from ICU patients.
Materials
and Methods
1. Subjects
This retrospective study included a total of 50 A. baumannii isolates
that were recovered from sputum specimens from adult ICU patients admitted to
King Hussein Medical Center (KHMC) in Amman, Jordan over a period of 18 months.
Approval was obtained from the Institution Ethical Review Board at
KHMC/Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
2. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests of A.
baumannii isolates
At the beginning, suspected pure growth of clinical specimens were
identified by BioMerieux VITEK 2 Automated Microbiology System (France)
using gram-negative ID card that can identify many different targets of gram
negative. A total of five colonies were inoculated in brain-heart infusion agar
plus 15% glycerol and kept frozen at -70 °C until used for further analysis.
All stored isolates were then sub-cultured on blood and MacConkey
agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. A. baumannii strains
were confirmed according to the following characteristics: gram-negative
coccobacilli, negative oxidase test, and non-lactose and non-glucose
fermentation, positive citrate and negative indol test. Later, they were
confirmed by the presence of blaOXA-51 gene on using PCR.
A.
baumannii strains were tested for
susceptibility against 13 different antibiotics using VITEK 2 AST–N233 and
AST-XNO5 susceptibility cards according to the manufacturer’s
instructions and recommendations (bioMerieux, France) and guidelines of the
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2018).
Antimicrobial
E-test strips (bioMérieux, France) were used to detect the minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) values for three antibiotics (Amikacin, Colistin and
Imipenem) as per the CLSI guidelines (CLSI, 2018) (22).
In
addition, one antimicrobial disk (Mast group LTD, UK) was used to
investigate the susceptibility of Acinetobacter isolates to
amikacin (30 μg/L) by disc diffusion method according to the CLSI guidelines
(CLSI, 2018).(22)
DNA
and Plasmid extraction of A. baumanniiGenomic
DNA was extracted during cell lysis, protein precipitation, DNA precipitation
and rehydration at room temperature using Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit
(Promega, USA). The bacterial plasmid was extracted using the Pure Yield
Plasmid minipreps system (USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The
extracted DNA and plasmid are stored at -20 °C for further investigations.
PCR
for detection of genes encoding blaOXA carbapenemases,
metalo-beta-lactamases, and class-1 integron in A. baumannii
All
primers of investigated genes and related information are listed in Table I
(Alpha DNA, Montreal, Canada). The primers were dissolved in nuclease-free
water (Promega, USA) to prepare them for investigation. The following
control strains were used during PCR steps, which were kindly donated by Prof.
Monzer Hamza, Laboratoire Microbiologie Sante et Environnement, Ecole Doctorale
des Sciences et de Technologie, Faculte de Sante Publique, Universite
Libanaise, Tripoli, Lebanon): A. baumannii (OXA-51 positive),
A. baumannii (OXA-23 positive), K. pneumonia (blaKPC
positive; ATCC BAA-1705), and K. pneumonia (blaNDM-1
positive; ATCC BAA-2146). DNA concentrations of each sample was evaluated
using Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo scientific, USA).
PCR
was carried out in 25 μl reaction volumes with 2.5 μl of extracted DNA, 12.5
pmol of each primer in Table II (Alpha DNA, Montreal, Canada), and 12.5 μl of
PCR green Go-taqR master mix (Promega, USA). The final volume was made up to 25
μl using nuclease-free water.
The amplification conditions of PCR were stabilized
according to Woodford et al. (2006). The PCR assays for the target genes were
performed by using programmable PCR system 9700 machine (Applied biosystem,
US). Negative control tubes containing master mix but without template DNA were
included in each run. At the end of each run, the tubes were held at 4 °C. The
amplified products and the PCR DNA marker were separated via electrophoresis on
2% agarose gels containing 15% Red safe stain for 40-50 min at 120 volts and then
visualized using Gel documentation system including UV camera, monitor and
printer (UVP, USA).
Table I:
Primers of blaOXA - carbapenemases, Metalo-beta-Lactamases ,Class-1
integrons.
Target genes
|
Primer name
|
Nucleotide sequence (5′ → 3′)
|
Product size (bp)
|
Annealing
temperature (∘C)
|
References
|
Class D carbapenemases
|
blaOXA-23
|
F-ATCGGATTGGAGAACCAGA
R-ATTTCTGACCGCATTTCCAT
|
501
|
58
|
(23)
|
Class D carbapenemases
|
blaOXA-24
|
F-
GGTTAGTTGGCCCCCTTAAA
R-
GTTGAGCGAAAAGGGGATT
|
246
|
58
|
(23)
|
Class D carbapenemases
|
blaOXA-51
|
F-
TAATGCTTTGATCGGCCTTG
R-
TGGATTGCACTTCATCTTGG
|
353
|
58
|
(23)
|
Class D carbapenemases
|
blaOXA-58
|
F-
AAGTATTGGGGCTTGTGCTG
R-
CCCCTCTGCGCTCTACATAC
|
599
|
58
|
(23)
|
Class D carbapenemases
|
OXA-143
|
F-TGGCACTTTCAGCAGTTCCT
R-TAATCTTGAGGGGGCCAACC
|
180
|
58
|
(23)
|
Class D carbapenemases
|
OXA-235
|
F-TTGTTGCCTTTACTTAGTTGC
R-CAAAATTTTAAGACGGATCG
|
700
|
58
|
(23)
|
Class B carbapenemases
|
NDM-1
|
F- ATT AGC CGC TGC ATT GAT
R- CAT GTC GAG ATA GGA AGT G
|
154
|
58
|
(24)
|
Class A carbapenemases
|
KPC
|
F-ATGTCACTGTA TCGCCGTCT
R-TTTTCAGAGCCTTACTGCCC
|
246
|
52
|
25
|
Integrons
|
Integron-1
|
F- ATGTGATGGCGACGCACGA
R- ATTTCTGTCCTGGCTGGCGA
|
600
|
55
|
Young, et al., 1999 (26)
|
Statistical
analysis
Results
We
used mean and standard deviation to analyze continuous variables such as age in
years. Other clinical features such as gender were analyzed using frequencies
and percentages. Statistical analysis were performed using SPSS software 23 for
Mac OS X (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). We considered p value to be
statistically significant at ≤ 0.05.
Table
II shows the
demographic characteristics of ICU patients with positive sputum cultures for A.
baumannii isolates.
The majority of patients were adults aged over 50 years, and 24% were positive
for blood culture at the same time or later on of sputum culture with negative
history of central catheter at the time of positive blood culture. Most of the
patients (64%) received medication prior to collection of specimens, and 76%
patients were on mechanical ventilation.
Table II
Major demographic characteristic of 50 ICUs patients .
Variables
|
No. (%) of patients with positive blood culture
N=12 (24%)
|
No. (%) of patients with negative blood cultures
N= 38 (76%)
|
P-value
|
OR (CI 95%)
|
Mean of age (17-87 years)
|
51.2
± 22.5
|
58.1 ± 19.9
|
0.3151
|
|
Gender
|
Male
|
6
|
50%
|
25
|
66%
|
0.3259
|
0.520 (0.140, 1.937)
|
Female
|
6
|
50%
|
13
|
34%
|
Mean length of stay in ICU
|
Less
than 7 days
|
1
|
8%
|
7
|
18%
|
0.7463
|
0.409 (0.008, 3.822)
|
More
than 7 days
|
11
|
92%
|
31
|
82%
|
Previous antibiotics treatments
|
Yes
|
10
|
83%
|
22
|
58%
|
0.1095
|
3.55 (0.626, 37.75)
|
No
|
2
|
17%
|
16
|
42%
|
Mechanical ventilation
|
Yes
|
12
|
100%
|
27
|
71%
|
0.2046
|
undefined
|
No
|
0
|
0%
|
11
|
29%
|
Figure 1 shows the results
of antimicrobial susceptibility using VITEK 2 AST –N233 and AST-XNO5 susceptibility
cards.
A. baumannii isolates were 100%
resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, aztreonam
ceftazidime, cefepime and ciprofloxacin. The
isolates were 94% resistant to imipenem, 72% resistant to amikacin, and 76%
resistant to gentamycin.
Figure 1: Antimicrobial resistance patterns
Minimal
inhibitory concentrations (MICs)
The
results of MICs for the three commonly used drugs, i.e., amikacin, colistin and
Imipenem,
against A. baumannii isolates are shown in Table III.
It
was found that 2% of isolates were resistant to colistin, whereas 94% and 72%
of isolates were resistant to imipenem and amikacin, respectively.
Table
III: MICs of 50 A. baumannii isolates
to 3 most used antibiotics in treatment of ICU patients
MIC range (mg/L) ON THE
STRIP
|
MIC50 (mg/L)
|
No.(%)
resistant isolates
|
Antimicrobial
|
0.017-2
|
0.37
|
1 (2)
|
Colistin
|
1-256
|
80.6
|
36 (72)
|
Amikacin
|
0.38-32
|
25.5
|
47 (94)
|
Imipenem
|
PCR
results
All
50 (100%) A. baumannii isolates were positive for OXA-51,
and 47 (94
%) isolates were positive
for OXA-23 genes as shown in Figure 2.
Other OXA genes were
found in less percentage (4-12%), while NDM-1, KPC and Integron-1 genes were detected in
26%, 22% and 86% isolates, respectively.
Figure 2:
Prevalence of blaOXA-carbapenemases, MBLs and Integron-1 genes among 50
isolates of A.baumannii.
Table (IV): Distribution of
blaOXA-carbapenemases, NDM-1, KPC and Integron-1 among ICU patients.
Gene name
|
No. (%) of patients with positive blood culture
N=12 (24%)
|
No. (%) of patients with
negative blood cultures
N= 38 (76%)
|
OXA-51
|
12
|
100%
|
38
|
100%
|
OXA-23
|
11
|
92%
|
36
|
95%
|
OXA-24
|
1
|
8%
|
1
|
3%
|
OXA-58
|
2
|
17%
|
4
|
11%
|
OXA-143
|
1
|
8%
|
0
|
0%
|
OXA-235
|
0
|
0%
|
3
|
8%
|
NDM-1
|
5
|
42%
|
8
|
21%
|
KPC
|
3
|
25%
|
8
|
21%
|
Integron-1
|
11
|
92%
|
32
|
84%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
his retrospective study
was designed to identify the phenotypic characteristics of A.
baumannii isolates, mainly the antibiogram, to illustrate the
resistance pattern and identify the genetic composition of these isolates. The
genetic compositions included extended-spectrum β-lactamases: blaOXA
carbapenemases, Metallo-β-lactamases and class-1 integrons. Also, the study
intended to detect the difference between the genetic contents of A.
baumannii isolates that are associated with invasive infections
represented by positive blood culture.
All of the patients in
our study are adults and their ages ranged from 17 to 87 years. Most of these
patients were aged more than 50 years. No significant differences were observed
in general demographic characteristics due to the small sample size.
Many studies worldwide
have reported that A. baumannii is the most frequently found
species among Acinetobacter group causing
healthcare-associated infections. This MDR organism is often associated with
high mortality (18,27,28,8). Also, A. baumannii is frequently
found to colonize many body sites of hospitalized patients, including respiratory
tracts of those in ICUs. Invasive infections, especially bacteremia with A.
baumannii, in hospitalized patients are frequently caused in
those patients who carry asymptomatically the organism in their respiratory
tract (29,30,8). The current study demonstrated that respiratory tracts of
ICU patients are frequently colonized with A. baumannii, especially
in those patients staying in ICU for a long duration and with a previous
history of antibiotic admintration. Invasive blood infection was detected among
24% of ICU patients during the study period (Table 2). The rest of the
isolates (76%) can be considered colonizers and might be converted into
potential pathogens for patients under certain circumstances, especially in
those who underwent invasive procedures and critically ill ICU patients (31,32).
Resistance to multiple
antibiotics is an important aspect associated with the clinical outcomes of
patients infected with A. baumannii in ICUs, especially
carbapenem resistance that causes difficulties in treating patients using other
antibiotics (33,34). In the present study, the majority of A.
baumannii isolates were resistant to 11 commonly used antimicrobial
agents (meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, aztreonam and ceftazidime,
cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and
gentamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) in the range of 72% to 100%. Also, our
isolates carried resistant genes to colistin in a small percentage (2%) and
have been considered as the last treatment option for A. baumannii infections.
The genetic section of this study demonstrates that all 50 MDR A.
baumannii isolates were 100% positive for intrinsic genes of blaOXA-51,
while 94% carried blaOXA-23 genes. A smaller percentage of isolates
carried other less common genes: blaOXA-24 (4%), blaOXA-58
(12%), blaOXA-235 (6%) and blaOXA-143 (2%). A recent
Jordanian study at King Hussein Cancer Center showed that all examined
MDR A. baumannii isolates from patients also harbored 100%
genes of blaOXA-51 and blaOXA-23, while they lacked blaOXA-58
or blaOXA-24 genes (8). Recent results from a Palestinian study
showed that 100% of A. baumannii isolates were positive
for blaOXA-51 and 82.6% were positive for 𝑏𝑙𝑎OXA-23. In comparison, their isolates carried 𝑏𝑙𝑎OXA-24 (14.5%) and 𝑏𝑙𝑎OXA-58 (3%), and none of their A.
baumannii isolates were positive for 𝑏𝑙𝑎OXA-143 and 𝑏𝑙𝑎OXA-235 (35). In addition, ambler class A
carbapenemase (KPC) has been detected during the last few years in A.
baumannii clinical isolates in many regions of the world (36,37). Our
study revealed that 22% of A. baumannii isolates
carried KPC genes. This finding is in agreement with the findings of
a previous Saudi study that had a prevalence rate of 34.5% among their
isolates(38).
The present study also found
that 86% of MDR A. baumannii isolates harbored integrase gene
(Figure 2). This integrase gene is a member of mobile genetic
elements, associated with both plasmids and transposons. The gene enhances
circulation of antimicrobial resistance genes in A. baumannii and
other gram-ND studies from Jordan and our region have confirmed that Class 1-
integrons are commonly present in clinical and environmental isolates of
gram-negative bacteria species such as A. baumannii and E.
coli and are often associated with MDR of these bacteria species, one
of these studies at KHCC,Amman, Jodan and the percent of harboring this gene is
near our result (8,39-40).
Conclusion
A. baumannii infection
is a serious infection in the immunocompromised patients, especially in ICUs.
This study also demonstrated that respiratory tract colonization is a source
for blood stream infection with a aggressive MDR A. baumannii.
In addition, the
existence of the integrase gene in more than two third of our A.
baumannii isolates in association with other resistance genes provided a
powerful evidence that these isolates have the potential for gaining more
antimicrobial resistance genes in future that may cause difficulty in the treatment of its infections and
result in rapid transmission in a hospital setting in clonal pattern. Also, we conclude the Acinetobacter
baumannii isolates from ICU patients
were more aggressive than isolates from any other site of immuncopromised
patients as cancer patients;the our isolates contain more resistant genes.
Thus, health care personnel and staff should follow infection
control measures and guidelines, such as active surveillance, hand hygiene, and
contact precautions, to control the transmission of MDR organisms.
REFERENCES
1.Antunes L, Visca P and Towner KJ. Acinetobacter baumannii:evolution of a global pathogen.
Pathog Dis; 2014;(71):292-301.
2. Obeidat N, Jawdat F , Al-Bakr GA and Shehabi AA. Major biological characteristics of Acinetobacter
baumannii isolates form hospital environmental and patients’
respiratory tract sources. American J Infect Control ; 2014; 42 : 401-4.
3. Ece, G., Erac, B., Cetin, H. Y., Ece, C.
and Baysak, A. Antimicrobial
susceptibility and clonal relation between Acinetobacter baumannii strains at a
Tertiary Care Center in Turkey. Jundishapur journal of microbiology, 2015;8(2).
4. Higgins PG, Dammhayn C, Hackel M and Seifert H. Global spread of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter
baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;(65): 233–238.
5. Towner KJ. Acinetobacter: an old friend, but a new enemy. J
Hosp Infect;2009;(73): 355-363.
6. Dekic, S., Hrenovic, J., Ivankovic, T. and,
Van Wilpe, E. Survival of
ESKAPE pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii in water of different temperatures and
pH. Water Science and Technology,2018;78(6), 1370-1376.
7. Rodríguez, Carlos Hernán, Marcela Nastro,
and Angela Famiglietti.
"Carbapenemases in Acinetobacter baumannii. Review of their dissemination
in Latin America." Revista Argentina de microbiologia .2018
8. Qouzah FH, Feras Hawari F, Abu-Qatouseh FL and Shehabi
AA. Occurrence and molecular
characterization of metallo- β-lactamases (MBLs) among Acinetobacter baumannii
isolates from cancer patients.IAJAA. 2018;Vol.( 8) No. 2:1.
9. Lee C-R, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, Cha C-J,
Jeong BC and Lee SH. Biology of Acinetobacter
baumannii: Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms, and Prospective
Treatment Options. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;(7):55. doi:
10.3389/fcimb.2017.00055.
10. Lei Gao, Yuan Lyu, Yun Li.
Trends in Drug Resistance of
Acinetobacter bumannii over a 10-year
Period:Nationwide Data from the China Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance
Program. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017; 20; 130(6):659-664.
11. Perez F, Hujer AM, Hujer KM, Decker BK, Rather PN and Bonomo
RA. Global challenge of
multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2007;(51):3471–3484. https://doi.org/10.1128/ AAC.01464-06.
12. Ballouz T, Aridi J, Afif C, Irani J, Lakis C, Nasreddine R
and Azar E. Risk Factors, Clinical
Presentation, and Outcome of Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteremia. Front. Cell.
Infect. Microbiol. 2017, (7):156
13. Routsi C, Pratikaki M, Platsouka E, Sotiropoulou C, Nanas S,
et al. Carbapenem-resistant versus
carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in a Greek intensive
care unit:risk factors, clinical features and outcomes. Infection 2010;
38:173-180.
14.Luna CM, Aruj PK. Nosocomial Acinetobacter pneumonia.Respirology 2007;
12:787-791
15. Doi, Y., Murray, G. L. and Peleg, A. Y. Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of
antimicrobial resistance—treatment options.In Seminars in respiratory and
critical care medicine 2015; Vol. 36, No.(1), p. 85.
16. Kim, S. W., Choi, C. H., Moon, D. C., Jin,
J. S., Lee, J. H., Shin, J. H., ...and Lee, J. C. Serum resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii through the
binding of factor H to outer membrane proteins. FEMS microbiology letters,
2009;301(2), 224-231.
17. Baadani, A. M., Thawadi, S. I., El-Khizzi,
N. A. and Omrani, A. S. Prevalence of
colistin and tigecycline resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical
isolates from 2 hospitals in Riyadh Region over a 2-year period. Saudi
medical journal, 2013; 34(3), 248-253.
18. Nazer L, Karabsheh A,Rimawi D, Hawari F. Characteristics and Outcomes of Acinetobacter
baumannii Infections in Critically Ill Patients with Cancer:A Matched
Case-Control Study. Microb Drug Resist2015; 21(5):556-561
19. Hurley JC.
World-wide variation in incidence of Acinetobacter associated
ventilatorassociated pneumonia:a meta-regression. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:577
20. Chang K-C, Lin M-F, Lin N-T, Wu W-J, Kuoet H-Y,etal. Clonal spread of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter
baumannii in eastern Taiwan. J MicrobiolImmunol Infect 2012; 45:37-42.
21. Lee C-R, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS,
Bae IK, etal. Biology of Acinetobacter
baumannii:Pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms,and prospective
treatment options. Front. Cell Infect Microbiol 2017; 7:1-8.
22. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial
Susceptibility Testing. 28th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA:
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.
23. Mostachio
A. K. , Van Der Heidjen I., Rossi F., Levin A.S., and Costa S.F., “Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding
oxacillinases and metallo-𝛽-lactamases
in carbapenemresistant Acinetobacter spp,” Journal of
Medical Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1522–1524, 2009.
24. Naas
T, Ergani A, Carrer A, Nordmann P.
Real-time PCR for detection of NDM-1 carbapenemase genes from spiked stool
samples. AntimicrobAgents Chemother 2011; 55(9):4038-43.
25. Hindiyeh M, Smollen G, Grossman Z,
Ram D, Davidson Y, et al. Rapid detectionof
blaKPCcarbapenemase genes by real-time PCR. J ClinMicrobiol 2008; 46(9):2879-83.
26. Young, H. K. and
Rosser, S. J., Identification
and characterization of class 1integrons in bacteria from an aquatic
environment. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1999, 44(1),
11-18.
27. Anudit, C., Kooltheat, N., Potup, P.,
Sranujit, R. P. and Usuwanthim, K. Nosocomial infection of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter
baumannii in Thailand. American journal of infection
control, 2016; 44(10), 1161-1163.
28. Logan, L. K., Gandra, S., Trett, A., Weinstein, R. A.
and Laxminarayan, R. Acinetobacter
baumannii Resistance Trends in Children in the United States,
1999–2012. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2018.
29. Wong D, Nielsen TB, Bonomo RA, Pantapalangkoor P, Luna B
and Spellberg B. Clinical and pathophysiological
overview of Acinetobacter infections: a century of challenges. Clin Microbiol
Rev.2017;(30):409 –447. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00058-16.
30. Ghaith DM, Zafer MM, Al-Agamy MH, Alyamani EJ, Booq RY,
Almoazzamy O The emergence of a novel
sequence type of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii from the intensive care unit of an
Egyptian tertiary care hospital. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2017; (16):
31. Al-Hassan L, El Mehallawy H, Amyes SGB. Diversity in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from
paediatric cancer patients in Egypt. ClinMicrobiol Infect2013; 19:1082-1088.
32. Helal S,
El Anany M, Ghaith D, RabeeaS .
The Role of MDRAcinetobacter baumannii in Orthopedic Surgical Site Infections.
Surg Infect (Larchmt)2015; 16:518-522.
33. Biglari S, Hanafiah A, Mohd Puzi S,
Ramli R, Rahman M and Lopes BS.
Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and genetic diversity of
multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from a
teaching hospital in Malaysia. Microb. Drug Resist.2016
34. Yang, Y., Fu, Y., Lan, P., Xu, Q., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., ... and
Yu, Y. Molecular
epidemiology and mechanism of sulbactam resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii
isolates with diverse genetic background in China. Antimicrobial agents
and chemotherapy, 2018; AAC-01947.
35. Handal, R., Qunibi, L., Sahouri, I.,
Juhari, M., Dawodi, R., Marzouqa, H. and Hindiyeh, M. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant
Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from hospitalized patients in
Palestine. International journal of microbiology.2017.
36. Bonnin, R. A., Cuzon, G., Poirel, L. and
Nordmann, P.
Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clone, France. Emerging
infectious diseases,2013; 19(5), 822.
37. Robledo
IE, Aquino EE, Vázquez GJ. Detection of the KPC gene in
Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter
baumannii during a PCR-based nosocomial surveillance study in Puerto Rico.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2011; 55: 2968–2970.
38. Al-Agamy, M. H., Shibl, A. M., Elkhizzi, N. A., Meunier, D.,
Turton, J. F.and Livermore, D. M. Persistence of Klebsiella pneumoniae clones with OXA-48 or
NDM carbapenemases causing bacteraemias in a Riyadh hospital. Diagnostic
microbiology and infectious disease, 2013; 76(2), 214-216.
39. Al-Dabaibah
N, Obeidat NM and Shehabi AA.
Epidemiology features of Acinetobacter baumannii colonizing respiratory tracts
of ICU patients. Int. Arab. J. Antimicrob. Agents.2013( 2):1, 1-7.
40. Shehabi
AA, Odeh JF and Fayyad M. Characterization of antimicrobial
resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from human
stools and drinking water sources in Jordan. J Chemother.2006; (18):
468–472.