ABSTRACT
Objective: The actual incidence of asymptomatic
infection with SARS-CoV-2 in children is unknown, with variation in the
estimated prevalence in the literature. Our study aimed to evaluate the
prevalence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic children attending elective dental
procedures under general anesthesia at a single institution.
Methods: The records for 128 patients, 68 males
(53.1%) and 60 females (46.9%), aged between 3 and 12 years, who were selected
for elective pediatric dental surgical procedures, were retrieved
retrospectively from the available electronic medical records (Hakeem) at Queen
Rania Al-Abdullah Hospital for Children from November 2020 to April 2021.
Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied for patient selection for
elective surgeries to make the estimated prevalence of COVID-19 among the study
population as reliable and valid as possible.
Results: The prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2
infection among the study population was approximately 7% (nine out of 128
patients). Forty-one of 128 patients were medically compromised (have other
medical conditions), and of those forty-one medically compromised, seven
patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only medical conditions
significantly affected the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) test results (p value<0.05), while gender, age groups, and
parents’ occupation did not.
Conclusion: Asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 is
prevalent among children, making them a potential source of the spread of
COVID-19. Therefore, healthcare providers should take precautions when dealing
with children and perform the RT-PCR to detect infected children if applicable.
Medically compromised children are more prone to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although
compromised children are at serious risk for severe disease, they may have no
symptoms before the diagnosis.
Keywords
Asymptomatic children,
Coronavirus, COVID-19, Prevalence of COVID-19, RT-PCR, SARS-CoV-2 infection.
JRMS
August 2024; 31 (2): 10.12816/0061992
Introduction
In December 2019, multiple cases of acute
respiratory illness of an unknown origin that share similar presentation,
particularly fever, were reported in Wuhan city, Hubei province of China (1, 2).
The intensive efforts directed to finding out the cause of the pneumonia showed
that a novel single-stranded RNA virus known as severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was the causative agent (2). Subsequently,
this acute respiratory illness was named ‘coronavirus disease 2019’ COVID-19
(2).
Coronavirus is a single-stranded RNA,
medium-sized (80 to 90 nm), enveloped, and round virus that gets its name from
the club-shaped and peculiar fringe of widely spaced projections covering its
surface (3). SARS-Cov-2 enters host cells by binding to the
angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) receptor expressed in various human
tissues, especially the respiratory tract (4). The majority of COVID-19
patients complain of fever, shortness of breath, and dry cough. Other patients
may have rhinorrhea, sneezing, sore throat, or other upper respiratory tract or
gastrointestinal symptoms (3, 5). Besides, a significant percentage of infected
patients may not experience any symptoms. Thus, they are considered a potential
source of substantial spread of the disease (6, 7).
The global outbreak of COVID-19
prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it as a pandemic in
March 2020 (8). Jordan, like many countries, enforced a national lockdown for
about two and a half months (between March 18 and June 4, 2020) in its attempt
to contain and prevent the spread of the coronavirus. From September 1, 2020,
the total number of daily-confirmed cases in Jordan increased rapidly from 68
up to 7,933 on November 19, 2020. This accelerated increase in confirmed cases
forced policymakers to apply more strict precautionary measures. In July 2021,
in Jordan, the number of confirmed cases with COVID-19 reached 756,923, with
9,836 deaths (9).
During the lockdown and for a long
period afterwards, outpatients’ clinics and elective operations were suspended.
Even after their return, there were strict precautionary measures in the health
sector to control the spread of infection among patients and healthcare
providers. The Jordanian Royal Medical Services (RMS) have been one of the
pioneers in this context. Many children attend outpatient clinics and undergo
surgeries at the JRMS hospitals. Queen Rania Al-Abdullah Hospital for Children
is an advanced tertiary and referral hospital that provides surgical and
medical services for a large number of children annually. On a daily basis,
close contact with children exposes the children themselves, parents, and
healthcare providers to infection with SARS-CoV-2.
The actual incidence of infection
with SARS-CoV-2 among children is unknown due to the lower percentage of children
being tested than adults and patients with severe illness and the significantly
lower hospitalization rate of children with COVID-19 than adults (10). In
Jordan in 2020, children aged less than 14 years old comprise about 32.85%
(3,351,730) of the total population (10,203,134) (11, 12).
Given the relatively limited
publicly available data concerning the prevalence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic
children in Jordan, urgent attempts should be directed to address this gap. This
study aimed to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic children attending
elective dental procedures under general anesthesia at Queen Rania Al-Abdullah
Hospital for Children.
Methods
A retrospective observational
study was conducted at pediatric dental clinics at Queen Rania Al-Abdullah
Hospital for Children, one of the Jordanian Royal Medical Services (JRMS)
hospitals, located in Amman, the capital of Jordan, between November 2020 and
April 2021. The data for 128 patients, 68 males (53.1%) and 60 females (46.9%),
aged between 3 and 12 years (divided into two groups from 3 to 6 and from 7 to
12 years old), who were selected for elective pediatric dental surgical
procedures, were obtained from the available electronic medical records (known
as Hakeem) in the hospital. All patients had dental pain and were indicated for
elective treatment under general anesthesia (uncooperative).
Patients were subjected to strict
selection criteria due to the critical pandemic situation during the study
period. The real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
test was ordered only for patients who met the inclusion criteria for elective
surgeries. It was performed on the day before surgeries, and results were
obtained on the same day from the JRMS laboratory. Surgeries were postponed for
four weeks for patients with positive RT-PCR test results, and the data for those patients were not
included again in the study. During follow-up periods, all patients had no
symptoms of COVID-19.
Inclusion criteria for patient
selection for elective surgeries:
Patients without any features of
COVID-19 aged between 3 and 12 years who had normal investigations (CBC, PT,
PTT, INR) and had no contraindications for general anesthesia were included.
Exclusion criteria for patient
selection for elective surgeries:
Patients who had one or more
features of the disease (fever, respiratory symptoms (chest pain and tightness,
and dyspnea), imaging evidence of pneumonia, general weakness, or fatigue, eye
symptoms (lacrimation and conjunctivitis), GI symptoms (diarrhea and vomiting),
dizziness, headache, and skin rash) were excluded.
The ethical committee (IRB) at the
JRMS approved the study (ethical code number: 38 _ 6/2012). The study protocol
adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in Tokyo
and Venice. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS; version 25)
was used for statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis
The SPSS, version 25, was used for
all computations and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Descriptive analysis was conducted for all variables using frequencies and
percentages. The relationship between the RT-PCR test (dependent variable) and
all other variables, including gender, age groups, parents’ occupation (medical
or non-medical), and the medical condition of patients (fit or compromised),
was assessed by Fisher’s exact test.
Results
A total of 128 subjects, 68 males
(53.1%) and 60 females (46.9%), participated in the study with a mean age of 6 ±2.3.
The characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. Eighty-seven (68%)
subjects were medically fit, while 41 (32%) were medically compromised. Patients
who were considered compromised had a history of medical illnesses, including
cardiac, respiratory, endocrinological, haemato-oncological,
neurodevelopmental, and genetic disorders (Table 2). Only 119 (93%) patients underwent surgical
procedures. Surgeries were cancelled for nine (7%) asymptomatic patients
infected with SARS-CoV-2. Seven of these nine patients were medically
compromised, and two of them were medically fit. The medical conditions with
these seven patients are epilepsy, autism, diabetes mellitus, tetralogy of
Fallot, acute lymphocytic leukemia, G6PD deficiency, and scleroderma (Table2).
During the follow-ups, all patients were symptom-free, and no complications
were reported.
The prevalence of COVID-19 among
the study population was approximately 7% (nine out of 128 patients). as
demonstrated from the results of the RT-PCR test. All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were
asymptomatic.
Only medical conditions
significantly affected the RT-PCR test results (p value<0.05). Of the nine
positive cases, two patients were medically fit, while the rest of the patients
were medically compromised (Table 3). Other factors, including gender, age groups,
and parents’ occupation did not significantly affect the RT-PCR test results.
Table I : Patients’ characteristics (simple descriptive analysis of 128
subjects)
Variables
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Age groups
|
3-6 years
|
82
|
64.1%
|
7-12 years
|
46
|
35.9%
|
Gender
|
males
|
68
|
53.1%
|
Females
|
60
|
46.9%
|
Medical condition
|
Compromised
|
41
|
32%
|
Fit
|
87
|
68%
|
Parents’ occupation
|
Medical
|
21
|
16.4%
|
None-medical
|
107
|
83.6%
|
Table II: Patients’ medical conditions (medically
compromised patients).
Medical condition
|
Number of patients
|
RT-PCR test result
|
Epilepsy/cerebral palsy
|
8
|
Positive in 1 patient
|
Autism/ ADHD
|
5
|
Positive in 1 patient
|
VSD and ASD
|
3
|
Negative
|
Asthma
|
3
|
Negative
|
Diabetes mellitus
|
3
|
Positive in 1 patient
|
Hypothyroidism
|
3
|
Negative
|
Global developmental delay
|
2
|
Negative
|
Cleft palate
|
1
|
Negative
|
Tetralogy of Fallot
|
1
|
Positive
|
Apert syndrome
|
1
|
Negative
|
Acute lymphocytic leukemia
|
1
|
Positive
|
Down syndrome
|
1
|
Negative
|
Hypogammaglobulinemia
|
1
|
Negative
|
Osteogenesis imperfecta
|
1
|
Negative
|
G6PD deficiency
|
1
|
Positive
|
factor VIII deficiency
|
1
|
Negative
|
Tuberculosis
|
1
|
Negative
|
Scleroderma
|
1
|
Positive
|
Phenylketonuria
|
1
|
Negative
|
Epidermolysis bullosa
|
1
|
Negative
|
Chronic cholestatic diseases
|
1
|
Negative
|
Total
|
41 (100%)
|
7 (17.1%)
|
VSD: Ventricular septal defect, ASD: Atrial septal defect,
ADHD: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, G6PD: Glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase.
Table
III. The relationship between RT-PCR results and all other
variables.
|
|
PCR result
|
Total
|
P-value
|
Gender
|
|
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
P value=0.304
|
Females
|
54 (45.4%)
|
6 (66.7%)
|
60
|
Males
|
65 (54.6%)
|
3 (33.3%)
|
68
|
Total
|
119
|
9
|
128
|
Age
|
3- 6 years
|
76 (63.9%)
|
6 (66.7%)
|
82
|
P value=1.000
|
7-12 years
|
43 (36.1%)
|
3 (33.3%)
|
46
|
Total
|
119
|
9
|
128
|
Medical condition
|
Compromised
|
34 (28.6%)
|
7(77.8%)
|
41
|
P value=0.005*
|
Fit
|
85 (71.4%)
|
2 (22.2%)
|
87
|
Total
|
119
|
9
|
128
|
Parents’ occupation
|
Medical
|
21 (17.60%)
|
0 (0 %(
|
21
|
P value=0.354
|
Non-medical
|
98 (82.4)
|
9 (100%)
|
107
|
Total
|
119
|
9
|
128
|
Fisher’s exact test was conducted to
calculate the P-value for this sample.
P-value<0.05* was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first study that aimed to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 in
asymptomatic children attending elective surgeries in Jordan. The current study
revealed that the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among asymptomatic
children is approximately 7%. The prevalence in the current study is very close
to the prevalence reported in previous studies. A study conducted by Guo et al.
found that the prevalence of asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 was
5.9% (13). Another study carried out by Dong et al. revealed that 4.4% of
children with COVID-19 were asymptomatic (14). However, the exact prevalence of
asymptomatic infected children remains a subject of variation between studies.
The prevalence of children infected with SARS-CoV-2 without symptoms, who were
tested in 28 children's hospitals in the United States before clinic visits,
surgery, or hospital admissions, varied from 0% to 2.2% (15). A systematic
review and meta-analysis that evaluated the clinical characteristics and
epidemiological spectrum of children with COVID-19 showed that approximately
23% of pediatric patients across 31 studies had no features of the disease
before the diagnosis (16). A single-arm meta-analysis that included 29 studies
with 4300 children infected with SARS-CoV-2 revealed that the estimated
prevalence of asymptomatic cases was 18.4% (17). Another study reported that
15-35% of children could have no symptoms (18). This variation in the estimated
prevalence among studies can be attributed to the difference in screening and
testing strategies between the countries.
Children experience milder
symptoms than adults do, and in some children, symptoms may be unrecognized
before the diagnosis (19-21). However, severe disease has been reported in
children (19, 21). In our study, the prevalence of asymptomatic infection in
children was estimated at 7%, which was higher than the prevalence among
asymptomatic adults in another study (1%) (22). This difference in the
prevalence of asymptomatic infection in pediatric patients can be linked to
host and exposure factors. The ACE2 receptors' maturity and function were
speculated to be lower in children than in adults. Besides, children have
higher levels of antibodies against the virus than adults since they encounter
more respiratory tract infections in winter. In addition, the developing immune
system in children may respond differently to pathogens than in adults (14). In
contrast to adults, children are usually kept at home and are therefore less
likely to be exposed to the virus or infected people (14).
Unhealthy older people, people who
are immunocompromised, and those with underlying medical disorders such as
cardiovascular and chronic respiratory illnesses, diabetes mellitus, and cancer
are more liable to develop severe disease with acute injury to the lungs,
heart, liver, and kidneys (4, 23, 24).
In contrast, the younger population and the elderly who are healthy
experience fewer symptoms and are at a lower risk of encountering severe
symptoms (24, 25). The symptoms of COVID-19 in paediatrics and adults are
similar, with a difference in the frequency of symptoms (26, 27). In this
study, medically compromised children were found to be more liable to get the
infection. However, all patients were asymptomatic and recovered without
complications. A study conducted by Shekerdemian et al. revealed that
comorbidities in children appeared to be an important factor in acquiring the
disease. Also, it confirmed that severe illness was less frequent in children
with significant preexisting comorbidities, with better hospital outcomes than
in adults (28).
We found that age and gender were
not correlated to the RT-PCR test results among the study population. Hu et al.
conducted a study that included data on the total number of confirmed incident
and death cases from SARS-CoV-2 infection in 177 countries. The study aimed to
recognize the age groups with higher susceptibility and fatality. They found
that the incidence and mortality rate of COVID-19 were negatively correlated to
age and gender in patients aged from 0 to 24 years (29).
As far as we know, this is the
first study that evaluated the prevalence of SARS-Cov-2 infection among
asymptomatic children attending elective surgeries in a single institution in
Jordan through a critical period of the pandemic. We excluded children with
symptoms similar to symptoms of COVID-19 from performing the RT-PCR test to
avoid any interference in the results, suspecting that SARS-CoV-2 infection was
the primary cause of their illness. This method made the results of our study
very realistic. However, the current study has some limitations. First, the
study had an observational retrospective design conducted in a relatively short
period. Second, the prevalence may be affected by the low probability of false
positive and false negative results of the RT-PCR test.
Conclusion
Asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2
is prevalent among children, making them a potential source of the spread of
COVID-19. Therefore, healthcare providers should take precautions when dealing
with children and should perform the RT-PCR to detect infected children if
applicable. Medically compromised children are more prone to SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Acknowledgements
None.
References
1- Bogoch II,
Watts A, Thomas-Bachli A, Huber C, Kraemer MUG, Khan K. Pneumonia of unknown
aetiology in Wuhan, China: potential for international spread via commercial
air travel. J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13; 27(2):taaa008. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa008.
PMID: 31943059; PMCID: PMC7107534.
2- Lu H,
Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan,
China: The mystery and the miracle. J Med Virol. 2020 Apr; 92(4):401-402. doi:
10.1002/jmv.25678. Epub 2020 Feb 12. PMID: 31950516; PMCID: PMC7166628.
3- Neuman BW,
Adair BD, Yoshioka C, Quispe JD, Orca G, Kuhn P, et al. Supramolecular
architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by
electron cryomicroscopy. J Virol. 2006 Aug; 80(16):7918-28. doi:
10.1128/JVI.00645-06. PMID: 16873249; PMCID: PMC1563832.
4- Ni W, Yang
X, Yang D, Bao J, Li R, Xiao Y, et al. role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
(ACE2) in COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020 Jul 13; 24(1):422. doi:
10.1186/s13054-020-03120-0. PMID: 32660650; PMCID: PMC7356137.
5- Peiris JSM.
Coronaviruses. Medical Microbiology. 2012:587–93. doi:
10.1016/B978-0-7020-4089-4.00072-X. Epub 2012 May 24. PMCID: PMC7170185.
6- Al-Qahtani
M, AlAli S, AbdulRahman A, Salman Alsayyad A, Otoom S, Atkin SL. The prevalence
of asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 in a cohort of quarantined subjects.
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan; 102:285-288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.091. Epub
2020 Nov 3. PMID: 33157290; PMCID: PMC7607262.
7- Sayampanathan
AA, Heng CS, Pin PH, Pang J, Leong TY, Lee VJ. Infectivity of asymptomatic
versus symptomatic COVID-19. Lancet. 2021 Jan 9; 397(10269):93-94. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32651-9. Epub 2020 Dec 18. PMID: 33347812; PMCID:
PMC7836843.
8- WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a
pandemic.
https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic.
(Accessed on 12 June, 2020).
9-WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard/
Jordan. https://covid19.who.int/region/emro/country/jo. (Accessed on July 12, 2021).
10- Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. Information for Pediatric Healthcare Providers. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/pediatric-hcp.html
(Accessed on 15 July, 2021).
11- Statistica.
Jordan: Age structure from 2010 to 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/385468/age-structure-in-jordan/ (Accessed on 15 July, 2021).
12- Worldometers. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/jordan-population/ (Accessed
on 15 July, 2021).
13- Guo CX, He L, Yin JY, Meng XG, Tan W,
Yang GP, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of pediatric COVID-19.
BMC Med. 2020 Aug 6; 18(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01719-2. PMID:
32762696; PMCID: PMC7408975.
14- Dong Y, Mo
X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 Among Children
in China. Pediatrics. 2020 Jun; 145(6):e20200702. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702.
Epub 2020 Mar 16. PMID: 32179660.
15- Sola AM,
David AP, Rosbe KW, Baba A, Ramirez-Avila L, Chan DK. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2
Infection in Children Without Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA
Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1; 175(2):198-201. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4095.
Erratum in: JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1; 175(2):212. PMID: 32840605; PMCID:
PMC7851725.
16- Li B,
Zhang S, Zhang R, Chen X, Wang Y, Zhu C. Epidemiological and Clinical
Characteristics of COVID-19 in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Nov 2; 8:591132. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.591132. PMID:
33224909; PMCID: PMC7667131.
17- Liu C, He
Y, Liu L, Li F, Shi Y. Children with COVID-19 behaving milder may challenge the
public policies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep
1; 20(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02316-1. PMID: 32873269; PMCID:
PMC7459157.
18- Alsohime
F, Temsah MH, Al-Nemri AM, Somily AM, Al-Subaie S. COVID-19 infection
prevalence in pediatric population: Etiology, clinical presentation, and
outcome. J Infect Public Health. 2020 Dec; 13(12):1791-1796. doi:
10.1016/j.jiph.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PMID: 33127335; PMCID:
PMC7574780.
19- Han MS, Choi EH, Chang SH, Jin BL, Lee
EJ, Kim BN, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Viral RNA Detection in Children
With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the Republic of Korea. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jan
1; 175(1):73-80. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3988. PMID: 32857112; PMCID:
PMC7455883.
20- Liguoro I,
Pilotto C, Bonanni M, Ferrari ME, Pusiol A, Nocerino A, et al. SARS-COV-2
infection in children and newborns: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2020
Jul; 179(7):1029-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03684-7. Epub 2020 May 18.
Erratum in: Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jul;180(7):2343. PMID: 32424745; PMCID:
PMC7234446.
21- Mehta NS,
Mytton OT, Mullins EWS, Fowler TA, Falconer CL, Murphy OB, et al. SARS-CoV-2
(COVID-19): What Do We Know About Children? A Systematic Review. Clin Infect
Dis. 2020 Dec 3; 71(9):2469-2479. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa556. PMID: 32392337;
PMCID: PMC7239259.
22- Wu Z,
McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from
the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7; 323(13):1239-1242.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. PMID: 32091533.
23- World Health Organization (WHO).
Statement: Older people are at highest risk from COVID-19, but all must act to
prevent community spread. 2020. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/statements/statement-older-people-are-at-highest-risk-from-covid-19,-but-all-must-act-to-prevent-community-spread. (Accessed on 15 July, 2021).
24- Liu K,
Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A
comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J Infect. 2020 Jun; 80(6):e14-e18.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 27. PMID: 32171866; PMCID:
PMC7102640.
25- Gardner W,
States D, Bagley N. The Coronavirus and the Risks to the Elderly in Long-Term
Care. J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct; 32(4-5):310-315. doi:
10.1080/08959420.2020.1750543. Epub 2020 Apr 3. PMID: 32245346.
26- Stokes EK,
Zambrano LD, Anderson KN, Marder EP, Raz KM, El Burai Felix S, Tie Y, Fullerton
KE. Coronavirus Disease 2019 Case Surveillance - United States, January 22-May
30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 19; 69(24):759-765. doi:
10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e2. PMID: 32555134; PMCID: PMC7302472.
27- Poletti P, Tirani M,
Cereda D, Trentini F, Guzzetta G, Sabatino G, et al. Association of Age With Likelihood of
Developing Symptoms and Critical Disease Among Close Contacts Exposed to
Patients With Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Italy. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar
1; 4(3):e211085. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1085. PMID: 33688964; PMCID:
PMC7948061.
28- Shekerdemian
LS, Mahmood NR, Wolfe KK, Riggs BJ, Ross CE, McKiernan CA, et al.
Characteristics and Outcomes of Children With Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) Infection Admitted to US and Canadian Pediatric Intensive Care
Units. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Sep 1; 174(9):868-873. doi:
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1948. PMID: 32392288; PMCID: PMC7489842.
29- Hu D, Lou X, Meng N, Li Z, Teng Y, Zou Y, et al. Influence of age and gender
on the epidemic of COVID-19: Evidence from 177 countries and territories -
an exploratory, ecological study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Apr; 133(7-8):321-330.
doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01816-z. Epub 2021 Feb 5. PMID: 33547492; PMCID:
PMC7864622.