ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the prevalence and length of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve in the Jordanian population, to aid proper treatment planning before interforaminal surgery.
Methods: 378 hemimandibles (right and left) were analyzed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. Two examiners studied cross-sectional views. The presence and the length of the anterior loop were measured.
Results: Anterior loop was visualized in 59.5% of the examined hemimandibles, the presence of the anterior loop was significantly higher on the right hemimandible than on the left hemimandible ( p-value 0.021).
The mean length of the anterior loops, when present, was 1.73mm (±0.84mm). The lengths range from 0.3 to 3.6mm. Conclusion: Our study showed that the presence of the anterior loop was significantly higher on the right
hemimandible than on the left hemimandible. Due to the high variation in the length of the anterior loop in the Jordanian population, a CT scan is necessary to visualize the anterior loop before interforaminal surgery or placing implants in the mental foramen region.
Keywords: inferior alveolar nerve, interforaminal surgery, anterior loop, mental foramen, CBCT,Jordanian population.
JRMS DECE 2024; 31 (3): 10.12816/0062043
INTRODUCTION:The inferior alveolar nerve enters the medial aspect of the mandible and runs through the mandibular canal until it branches at the Mental Foramen (MF) to give off the mental branch which leaves the mandible to innervate the soft tissue and the incisal branch which remains within the incisive canal (1,2).
From the departments of: dental department
As the inferior alveolar nerve leaves the mandible via the mental foramen, multiple anatomical variations in the anteroposterior position of the foramen, the presence of accessory foramina, and the presence or absence of an anterior loop (AL) could be encountered (2, 3). The AL is when the inferior alveolar nerve loops within the mandible bone inferior and anterior to the mental foramen before it exits the mental foramen (3). (Fig 1)
Dental and surgical procedures in the anterior mandible are not uncommon; and might be in close proximity to the mental foramina. These procedures include local anesthetic injections, maxillofacial surgeries, endodontic surgeries, and interforaminal dental implant placement.
Consequently, the mental nerve’s anatomical variations need to be thoroughly studied and understood, to avoid iatrogenic trauma to the nerve, which might lead to temporary or permanent neurosensory disturbances, or altered sensation (3,4).
Many methods have been used to examine and study the position of the mental foramen itself, such as palpation, inspection during surgery, and different radiographic techniques (5). However, to assess the presence of an AL, clinical methods are useless because, as stated above, it is an intrabony structure therefore, radiographical tools are needed. Radiographs might also help.
differentiate the AL from the incisive canal or any periapical pathology in the premolar area (6,7).
Despite the worldwide acceptance of panoramic x-rays in studying overall dental conditions and pathology, they still have inherent limitations, such as their two-dimensional nature, superimposition, and distortion. On the other hand, the relatively new Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), solves many of these problems, despite higher costs and relatively higher radiation doses. It has a negligible distortion and an interactive three-dimensional nature that allows clinicians to study anatomy as clean-cut slices regardless of the surrounding structures (8).
Many studies have concluded that significantly fewer loops were detected in panoramic radiographs than in cadaveric jaws or CBCT images. Moreover, the loop measurements were also significantly shorter in panoramic-based research. CBCTs, on the other hand, had the ability to identify the presence and length of the AL accurately (8, 9) Other researchers found that panoramic radiographs have a high incidence of false-negative and false-positive results in identifying the anterior loop and are consequently unreliable (9,10).
Since the presence of the anterior loop is suggested to exhibit a racial trend (11, 12), and because of the lack of studies on the Jordanian population, the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence and length of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve in the Jordanian cohort.
CBCT was used in our study as it is found to be more accurate as discussed above.
METHODS
After the institutional ethical committee of the Royal Medical Services approval was obtained, this retrospective cross-sectional study took place in the Dentistry and Maxillofacial Department at Queen Alia Military Hospital Amman, between March and December 2020. Images of patients, who had previously undergone CBCT imaging for different clinical reasons, were retrieved from the department’s records
Out of the 252 subjects’ images inspected for the study, 189 fulfilled the study’s criteria. The
subjects of the study were ethnic Jordanians, an age range
between 23 and 79.
Exclusion criteria were:
History or evidence of previous trauma or major surgical procedures in the mandible.
Growth or developmental disorders.
Generalized or localized maxillofacial pathologies.
Missing teeth between the canine and first molar on both sides.
Images with an inadequate field less than the first molar to the first molar.
Images of inadequate quality due to artifacts or haziness.
Two well-trained highly experienced dentists, a prosthodontist and an endodontist who work in the same department studied the scans. Both read CBCTs regularly either for implant placement or for endodontist treatments. Before starting data collection, the examiners analyzed 20 scans until the intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability was obtained (Cohen’s kappa=0.85
MACHINE AND PROGRAM
CBCT scans were acquired via the Kodak Carestream CS900 computed tomography machine by a well-trained technologist. The machine settings were as follows: the tube voltage was between 85-95 kv, and the current was 4.0 or 5.0 mA according to the patient’s size. The voxel size used was 300 micrometers. Fields of the included images were either 8*8 or 13*11.5 and had to include the mandible. Exposure times ranged from 8-11 seconds according to the selected field and the patient’s size. The Carestream 3D imaging software reconstruction program was used to reconstruct and visualize the images.
The examiners then evaluated the reconstructed images in axial, sagittal, and coronal views using the “oblique slicing” view.
ADJUSTING THE CUTS AND DETECTING THE ANTERIOR LOOP
The analysis started by scrolling the axial cuts to view the mental foramina. The selected volume was then rotated towards the side being studied in order to position the mandibular canal’s long axis parallel to the sagittal plane, this rotations aim was to set the coronal reconstruction perpendicular to the region of interest (figure- 2). Coronal slices were then used as follows: The section where the mesial end of mental foramen was spotted, and then sections anterior to this one were screened for the presence of the anterior loop by analyzing any radiolucencies. The anterior loop can either show as a single big hypodense area, or as two smaller hypodense areas: one represents the lumen of the mandibular canal that traverses the mental foramen anteriorly; the other reflects the turning back of the mandibular canal (13).
According to Apostolakis and Brown (13), a single round hypodense area is considered as an incisive canal if it measures less than 3 mm in diameter. On the other hand, if the diameter is 3 mm or more the hypodense area is regarded as the anterior extension of the mandibular canal and therefore considered an anterior loop (figure 3).
MEASURING THE ANTERIOR LOOP IF PRESENT
The distance between the mesial edge of the mental foramen and the anterior end of the hypodense area is the anterior loop. To measure this distance, as shown in (figure 4), the number of slices is multiplied by the thickness of each slice which is 0.3 mm in this study. The process of
counting slices and multiplying by 0.3 was completed for each hemi-mandible for the whole sample.
Statistical analysis
The resulting data were analyzed using SPSS (version). Descriptive statistical methods were applied to summarize the anterior loop frequencies, percentages and mean length.
A student t-test was used, to compare gender, face side, and mean differences in length. P-values
of <0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS
Two hundred and fifty-two subjects were initially screened, 63 of which were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria mentioned above. The CBCT scans of 189 patients met the
criteria and were consequently assessed, of which 109 (58%) were men and 80 (42%) were
women (Table 1).
(Table1) Demographic distribution of the study population
Factor
|
Categories
|
Number
|
Percentage %
|
Age group
n=189
|
20-40 years
41-60 years
61-80 years
|
55
75
59
|
29
40
31
|
Gender
n=189
|
Male
female
|
109
80
|
58
42
|
Anterior loops were visualized in 225 (59.5%) of the 378 total examined hemimandibles (half of the mandible: right or left) . The presence of anterior loop was significantly higher on the right side, as 124 (65.6 %) of right hemimandibleshad anterior loops, compared to 101 (53.4%) of left hemimandibles, X2 (1, N =378) =5.809, p =
0.021. Males were more likely to have anterior loops, as they were visualized in 137(62.8%) of
males’ hemimandibles, compared to 88(55%) of females’ hemimandibles, but the relationship was not statistically significant, X2 (1, N =378) =2.357, p= 0.13, (Table 2).
Table 2) the prevalence of anterior loop of the mandibular nerve according to the side of the mouth and the gender of the patient
Group (n)
|
Total
|
Absence of anterior loop
n (%)
|
Presence of anterior loop
n (%)
|
p-value
|
Gender
Male (109)
Female (80)
|
218
160
|
81 (37.2)
72 (45)
|
137 (62.8)
88 (55)
|
0.13
|
Hemimandibles
Right
Left
|
189
189
|
65 (34.4)
88 (46.6)
|
124 (65.6)
101 (53.4)
|
0,021
|
An anterior loop was not identified in 20.6% of the 189 evaluated CBCT scans as shown in (Table 3)
The AL length in the sample ranged from 0.3 to 3.6mm. The mean length of the anterior loops in the 225 hemimandibles, when present, was 1.73mm (±0.84mm).
The mean length on the right side was 1.69mm (±0.76). On the other hand, the mean length
(Table 3) prevalence of anterior loop in 189 mandible CBCTs
Anterior loop prevalence
|
n (%)
|
Absent
|
39 (20.63%)
|
Bilateral
|
76 (40.21%)
|
Right only
|
49 (25.93%)
|
Left only
|
25 (13.23%)
|
Total
|
189 (100%)
|
was 1.76 mm (±0.93) in the left hemimandibles. The mean length in female patients was 1.65mm± (0.88), on the other hand, the mean length in male patients was 1.76mm (±0.88). No significant influence of gender or facial side on the length of the anterior loop was found. With P values of 0.344 and 0.603 respectively (Table 4).
(Table 4) Mean values of anterior loop length according to gender and side of the face)
Factor
|
Mean length mm (±SD)
|
P-value (Student's t-test)
|
Side of the mandible
Right Left
Gender Male
Female
|
1.69 (±0.76)
1.76 (±0.93)
1.76 (±0.88)
1.65 (±0.88)
|
0.603 (221)
0.344 (0.947)
|

Figure 1: Anterior loop shows as radiolucency anterior to the mesial end of the mental
Left hemimandible shows an anterior loop (between the two blue lines). While the right hemimandible shows no anterior loop.
