I read with interest, the article titled “Peripancreatic
Tuberculous Lymphadenitis misdiagnosed as Pancreatic Tumor: A case report” in
the journal.(1) It is well known that Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (MTB) infections may present with diverse presentation in the clinical
scenarios. It was reported to infect almost all organs, including those of the
peritoneal cavity, not exclusively lymph nodes around the pancreas(1)
but also female pelvic tract which may mimic pelvic tumors with false positive
CA125.(2,3) It also causes
omental lymphadenitis, omental tuberculosis, and tuberculous peritonitis.(4) In this interesting article, S. Mahafza and his group
reported an uncommon presentation of enlarged peripancreatic lymph nodes. Work
up short of the final definitive procedure (laparotomy) was not diagnostic,
however chest roentegenography may have had given a clue towards this
possibility. In abdominal tuberculosis, chest X-rays show evidence of
concomitant pulmonary lesions in less than 25% of cases;(4) however
I do not recommend just to bring to a close there, and to accept this finding
as the sole main point towards the diagnosis. An exploratory laparotomy was needed
and pursued as a diagnostic procedure; it gave the definitive diagnosis of MTB
infection proved by histopathology as shown.
As part of the work up, a PPD test was
administered, and was strongly positive. It has been the practice not to
utilize the PPD as a test to diagnose or to disprove the presence of tuberculosis
as a disease; PPD means mostly that infection with MTB took place i.e. not
disease.(5) In this patient, I guess it was done as a procedure
that many of us unnecessarily would do “routinely” in similar situation. In
this patient with her chest X-ray findings, the PPD test is not helpful; on the
contrary it is contraindicated. PPD positivity would not have added to the
concerned diagnosis, its negativity would not exclude it.(6)
A
second statement in “discussion” is of interest to me “If medical therapy had
failed, then the surgical treatment would have been an option”. Decades agosurgical
approach was a common option to deal with Tuberculosis in both extensive and non-responding
localized disease. Unfortunately, with the spread of MDR-MTB (Multi Drug
Resistant Tuberculosis) infection, and its worse successor the XDR-MTB
(extensively Drug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis) though to a much less
extent, both strains narrowed severely the therapeutic options, and gave a way for
the surgical option again. Short of having tests done on Mycobacteria like sensitivity
and specificity, we may encounter mycobacterial cases that are non-tuberculous(7)
or drug resistant, leaving us without a sharp judgment. Nowadays, a big concern that we may have
worldwide is the MDR-MTB. This highlights the need to utilize more culture
techniques, polymerase chain reactions (PCR) to detect resistant genes, and
sensitivity patterns, by making them available. Meanwhile, we have to exercise
caution in dealing with MTB apparently non-responding to treatment.
Jamal Wadi MD
Office
9, Third Floor, Jordan
Hospital Medical
Center, Queen Noor Street
Jordan Hospital
and Medical Center. Amman-Jordan
Tele/fax +962 6 568 6551
E-mail:jamalwadimd@yahoo.com
JRMS
April 2008; 15(1):5
References
1. Mahafza S, Ghazzawi I, Al-Ajarmeh K. Peripancreatic
tuberculous lymphadenitis misdiagnosed as pancreatic tumour:a case report. JRMS
2007; 14(3): 54-56
2. I˙lhan, Durmus og˘lu. Case
report of a pelvic-peritoneal tuberculosis presenting as an adnexial mass and
mimicking ovarian cancer, and a review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2004; 12:87-89
3. Mehrangiz
Hatami. Tuberculosis
of the Female Genital Tract in Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine; 2005; 8(1): 32-35.
4. Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis,
Review Article. Indian J Med Res 2004; 120: 305-315.
5.
Diagnostic Standards and Classification of
Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 16(4):
1376-1395.
6. Mandell GL, Bennett
JE, Dolin R. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Principles and practice
of infectious disease. 6th edition. Churchill Livingston, USA; 2006.
7. Hatherill M, et al. Isolation of non-tuberculous
mycobacteria in children investigated for pulmonary tuberculosis. 2006 December
20; doi: 10.1371 /journal.pone.0000021.