Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnosis of acute knee
monoarthritis and its relation to age and gender among adult patients referred
to the rheumatology clinic at Prince Hashem Hospital.
Methods: This study was carried out at Prince Hashem
Hospital, over a period of two years from July 2000-July 2002. One hundred and
fourteen patients were enrolled in the study after fulfillment of our
predetermined criteria. They all underwent physical, radiological and
laboratory tests. Synovial fluid analysis was also performed to all patients.
Results: Out
of 152 patients referred to our clinic, only 114 patients fulfilled the
criteria for the study, 36.8% patients were females, with male to female ratio
1.7:1, age ranged from (22-90) with a mean age of 49.4 years.
Osteoarthritis
was the predominant diagnosis reaching (43%) followed by gouty arthritis (29%),
right or left knee were affected close to each other. Reiter’s syndrome,
brucellosis, and pseudogout were the least to be found (0.9%) for each.
Conclusion:
Acute monoarthritis remains a challenge both diagnostically and
therapeutically, but with careful physical examination, radiological,
laboratory and the most important synovial fluid aspiration and analysis, this
condition can be treated and alleviating its bad consequences.
Key words:
Knee effusion, monoarthritis, synovial fluid analysis,
JRMS
Dec 2004; 11(2): 30-33
Introduction
Monoarthritis, by definition, is an inflammation that
involves a single joint regardless of its size, presented with swelling
restricted to the joint, limitation of movement with tenderness (1). Its onset is usually acute and sometimes
dramatic, with or without fever, pain, and swelling (2).
Acutely swollen and tender knee joint is the most
frequent rheumatologic emergency
in clinical practice (3). It accounts for 20% of all visits to primary
care physicians’ (4).
History and physical examination can provide highly suggestive
diagnostic clue, while arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis can sometimes
give a definitive diagnosis, and it should be regarded as infectious unless
proved otherwise (5).
Septic arthritis is still associated with considerable morbidity and
mortality due to delay in diagnosis so it is important to be considered in the
differential diagnosis of swollen joint (6).
Also non-septic articular disorders are fairly common
and represent a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge (7).
Trauma is the commonest cause of acute monoarthritis among patients attending
an emergency department. However, in a
significant minority of patients, there will be no history of trauma, where
they need different approach and investigation (6). A basic
approach to acute monoarthritis includes; a careful history, a physical
examination, radiographs, and a selected laboratory tests (8).
Effusion yields fluids of characteristic nature:
noninflammatory, inflammatory, septic, or hemorrhagic. This categorization of
the effusion may permit specific diagnosis or narrowing of differential
diagnosis.
Therefore arthrocentesis and the subsequent evaluation
of synovial effusion is often the definitive diagnostic procedure for the
patient presenting with joint effusion or intrasynovial hemorrhage (9).
The joint can reflect a wide variety of systemic
diseases as monoarthritis such as; connective tissue disease, inflammatory
bowel disease, sarcoidosis, and vasculitis (6).
Methods
This study was carried out at Prince Hashem Bin
Al-Hussein hospital over a period of two years from July 2000 to July
2002. All patients who had been referred
to the rheumatology clinic from different clinics of the hospital were
initially evaluated in different occasions (one day apart).
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with history of trauma.
-
Patients under the age of 16.
-
History of onset more than 14 days.
-
Patients with oligo-or polyarthritis and
those with both knee swelling.
Those patients who had only knee joint effusion were
enrolled in the study. Effusion was proved by clinical (milking test and
patellar tap test), and radiographic examinations. All knees were aspirated and
synovial fluid was sent to the laboratory for analysis.
We looked for the diagnosis of the swollen knee, age,
sex of the patient, and the affected knee. One hundred fifty two patients had
been referred to our clinic. One hundred fourteen patients who fulfilled our
criteria were enrolled in the study.
Knee radiographs (anteroposterior, lateral, weight and
non-weight bearing) were obtained to all patients, Complete blood cells (CBC),
C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocytes sedimentation rate (ESR), uric acid
(UA), kidney and liver function test (KFT, LFT), rheumatoid factor (RF), and
other laboratory tests (as needed) were performed. Synovial fluid was analyzed
for; gross appearance, cells type, gram staining, culture, and crystals.
Selected criteria (10-13) were used for the diagnosis of the
patients.
Results
One hundred fourteen patients fulfilled the criteria
for inclusion in the study. Forty- two
(36.8%) patients were females while male patients were 72 (63.2%), the age of
the study group ranged from (22-90) years with mean age of 49.4 years. Almost
both knees were affected equally; the left knee was affected in (52.6%) while
the right side was affected in (47.4%). (Table I).
We found that osteoarthritis (43%) was the most common
diagnosis followed by the gouty arthritis (29%). Reactive arthritis came in
third place (10.5%). Palindromic arthritis and psoriatic arthritis had similar
percentage (4.4%), Behcet’s syndrome (5.3%), while Pseudogout, and Brucellosis
Reiter’s Syndrome were the least
encountered in the
study with a
percentage of nearly
(1%) for each. (Table II).
Gouty arthritis starts earlier, (44.1%) before the age
of 50 years, than those of osteoarthritis (22%) in the same age group (Table
III). Both knees were affected almost equally in osteoarthritis patients (left
53% and right 47%). In the gouty
patients the frequency of the left knee affected was double than the right
(left 66.7% right 33.3%), (Table IV). Gouty arthritis affects male patients more
than females 73% and 27% respectively, while osteoarthritis affects almost both
sexes similarly (53.1% males, 46.9% females) (Table V).
Discussion
Acutely swollen and tender knee joint is the most
frequent rheumatologic emergency
in clinical practice (3). It is a medical emergency, the urgency of the
situation is dictated by the potential joint destruction from untreated
infection, and not merely by the pain and disability that brings the patient to
the physician. For this reason we tried to find what diagnosis could be found
from the non-traumatic knee monoarthritis and its frequency rate.
The most frequent cause was degenerative joint disease
(DJD) with a (42.74%). Freed JF et al (1) found (DJD)
to be the most common cause but in a lower percentage (26.3%).
While Preslar III et al (4)
found (DJD) in lower a percentage (17%), it came in second place after
idiopathic type.
According to Towheed, trauma was the commonest cause of
acute monoarthritis and followed up by gout (8), in our study we excluded
those with history of trauma because we could not follow them (they have been
referred to orthopedic specialists and followed by them).
Gout is a common cause of acute non-traumatic
monoarthritis (ANMA) mainly
in a middle-aged
man (14), It was also common in our study (29%) and
their mean age was 51.8 years (Table II) which is higher than that found by
Preslar (4), and Freed
JF (1) (15%, 18.4%) respectively. In an audit of 408 synovial fluid samples, 25
(6.1%) samples showed crystals (15), which is too far from
our findings.
Reactive arthritis is the commonest form of
inflammatory arthritis in young men (16), it was found in 12
patients (10.5%) who all were young (22-37 years) with a mean age of 26.75
years.
Palindromic rheumatism, a syndrome that can be the
initial manifestation of many different organic processes or one that never
evolves into anything more (17).
Septic arthritis is still associated with considerable
morbidity and mortality; due to delay in diagnosis (6), the
most common cause of septic arthritis in adults is gonococcus (18).
Only one patient had brucellosis, which is lower than that was reported in
other studies (1,4). This difference may be explained by 2
reasons; first, patients with gonococcal infection rarely present to doctors in
Jordan due to religious and ethical reasons. Second, septic arthritis is due to
penetrating trauma, contiguous spread of osteomyelitis, and extension from a
wound infection (19), these patients are usually treated by
Orthopedic Department. Despite this, septic arthritis should be suspected in
all patients who present with an acutely swollen joint.
Two patients had pseudogout and another one had
Reiter’s syndrome, Preslar (4) found pseudogout in 3% of his
patients, a percentage close to ours (1.8%), 5.3% was found by Freed JF (1).
Finally, diagnosis can be difficult, particularly in
the presence of underlying joint disease. Immediate joint aspiration with
Gram’s stain, culture, and analysis of the synovial fluid is essential. Intensive,
long-term antibiotic therapy is necessary to prevent a high rate of morbidity
and, possible, death from septic arthritis (19).
Synovial fluid analysis is a “Liquid biopsy” of the
joint; it is like urinalysis for renal disease, its urgency is compared to the
need for lumbar puncture if meningitis is suspected. It should be performed to every patient with
monoarthritis, as it is a simple safe procedure that can be performed at the
bedside or in the office with almost no complication as long as sterile
technique is used (20). Standard light microscope may show
crystals in a form that can suggest the correct diagnosis and definitive
diagnosis confirmed by polarized light microscope (21).It is worth mentioning here; insignificant trauma willbring a pre-existing condition such as gout or septic
joint to the patient attention, causing the individual to present to the
emergency with a history of “joint trauma”.
Conclusion
Acute monoarthritis remains a challenge both
diagnostically and therapeutically; but with careful physical examination,
radiological, laboratory and accurate synovial fluid aspiration and analysis,
this condition can be treated which can prevent its bad consequences.
Synovial fluid aspiration is a simple safe procedure
that can be performed at the bedside or in the office with almost no
complications as long as sterile technique is used. It is mandatory in every
patient with acute monoarthritis and it is usually diagnostic. One might say
that the approach to the acute joint is with a needle!
Further studies are needed to follow up patients with
osteoarthritis (both mono and bilateral), to identify those with repeated
effusions and to determine the underlying causes.
Limitation of the study
Cell count in the synovial fluid was not easy to obtain
(not documented in the medical and laboratory records).
Table
I. Age, gender, and affected knee distribution of the study group
Gender
|
Number of patients
|
Age
|
Affected knee
|
Left
|
Right
|
Frequency
|
%
|
Range
|
Mean
|
Frequency
|
%
|
Frequency
|
%
|
Female
|
42
|
36.8
|
|
47.3
|
23
|
54.8
|
19
|
45.2
|
Male
|
72
|
63.2
|
59(24-83)
|
50.7
|
37
|
51.4
|
35
|
48.6
|
Total
|
114
|
100
|
68(22-90)
|
49.4
|
60 (52.6%)
|
54 (47.4%) |
Table
II. Distribution of patients’ age,
and gender in relation to diagnosis.
|
No. of patients
|
Gender
|
Age
|
Affected knee
|
Diagnosis
|
Frequency
|
%
|
Male (%)
|
Female (%)
|
Range/mean
|
Right
|
Left
|
Reiter’s Syndrome.
|
1
|
0.9
|
1
|
0
|
42
|
0
|
1
|
Pseudogout
|
2
|
1.8
|
2
|
0
|
56
|
1
|
1
|
Brucellosis
|
1
|
0.9
|
1
|
0
|
65
|
1
|
0
|
Psoriatic Arthritis
|
5
|
4.4
|
3 (60)
|
2 (40)
|
28-66 (42.8)
|
3
|
2
|
Palindromic arthritis
|
5
|
4.4
|
3 (66.6)
|
2 (33.3)
|
24-41 (30.33)
|
4
|
1
|
Behcet’s Syndrome
|
6
|
5.3
|
6
|
0
|
25-36(31.16)
|
4
|
2
|
Reactive Arthritis
|
12
|
10.5
|
6 (50)
|
6 (50)
|
22-37(26.75)
|
7
|
5
|
Gout
|
33
|
29
|
24(73)
|
9(27)
|
30-72(51.76)
|
11
|
22
|
Osteoarthritis
|
49
|
43
|
26(53.1)
|
23(46.9)
|
36-90(57.68)
|
23
|
26
|
Total
|
114
|
100.0
|
72 (63.2)
|
42(36.8)
|
22-90(49.40)
|
54
|
60 |
Table
III. Age group of gouty and osteoarthritis patients.
Age group
|
Osteoarthritis
|
Gouty arthritis
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
30-39
|
3
|
6
|
7
|
20.6
|
40-49
|
8
|
16
|
8
|
23.5
|
50-59
|
15
|
30
|
6
|
17.6
|
60-69
|
14
|
28
|
9
|
26.5
|
>70
|
10
|
20
|
4
|
11.8
|
Total
|
50
|
100
|
34
|
100.0 |
Table
IV. Affected knee in Osteoarthritis
and gouty patients.
|
Osteoarthritis (50
patients)
|
Gout (34 patients)
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Left Knee
|
26
|
53.1
|
22
|
66.7
|
Right Knee
|
23
|
46.9
|
11
|
33.3
|
Total
|
49
|
100
|
33
|
100 |
Table
V. Gender in Osteoarthritis and gouty patients.
|
Osteoarthritis (49 patients)
|
Gout (33 patients)
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Female
|
23
|
46.9
|
9
|
27.3
|
Male
|
26
|
53.1
|
24
|
72.7
|
Total
|
49
|
100
|
33
|
100 |
References
1. Freed
JF, Nies KM, Boyers RS, Louie JS.
Acute monoarticular arthritis. A diagnostic approach. JAMA 1980;
243(22): 2314-2316.
2. Scutellari
PN, Orzincolo C, Castaldi G, Franceschini F. Monaqrthritis. Radiolo Med (Torino) 1995;
90(6): 689-698 (Abstract).
3. Stucki
G, Villiger PM. Gonarthritis:
Diagnosis and therapy. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1996; 85(37): 1108-1115
(Abstract).
4. Preslar
AJ III, Heckman JD. Emergency
department evaluation of the swollen joint. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1984;
2(2): 425-440.
5. Sack
K. Monarthritis: Differential
diagnosis. Am J Med 1997; 102(1A): 30S-34S.
6. Till
SH, Snaith ML. Assessment,
investigation, and management of acute monoarthritis. J Accid Emerg Med.
1999; 16(5): 355-361 (Abstract).
7. Llauger
J, Palmer J, Roson N, et al. Nonseptic monoarthritis: imaging features with clinical and
histopathological corelation. Radiographics 2000; 20 Spec No: S263-278.
8. Towheed
TE, Hochberg MC. Acute
monoarthritis: A practical approach to assessment and treatment. Am Fam
Physician 1996; 54(7): 2239-2243 (Abstract).
9. Sternbach
GL, Baker FJ 2nd.
The emergency joint: Arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis. JACEP
1976; 5(10): 787-792 (Abstract).
10. Wallace
SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, et al. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of
primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977; 20: 895-900.
11. International
study group for Behcet’s disease:
Criteria for diagnosis
of Behcet’s disease.
Lancet 1990; 335: 1078-1080.
12. Altman
R, Asch E, Bloch G, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of
osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the Knee. Arthritis
Rheum 1986; 29:1039-1049.
13. Fan
PT, Yan Yu DT. Reiter’s
Syndrome. In Kelley W, Ruddy S, Harris Jr E, Sledge C. editors: Textbook of
Rheumatology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders 1997; 984.
14. Marino
CT, Greenwald RA. Acute
arthritis. Med Clin North Am 1981; 65: 177-178.
15. Pal
B, Nash J, Oppenheim B, et al. Is routine synovial fluid analysis necessary? Lessons and recommendations
from an audit. Rheumatol Inter 1999; 18(5/6): 188-82.
16. Keat
A. Reiter’s syndrome and
reactive arthritis. In: Collected reports on the rheumatic diseases. Robin C.
Butler, Malcolm IV Jayson. editors. 1995; 61-64. ARC Derbyshire.
17. Edward
D., Harris Jr. Clinical feature
of rheumatoid arthritis. In Kelley W, Ruddy S, Harris Jr E, Sledge C. editors:
Textbook of Rheumatology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders 1997; 901.
18.Sharp
JT, Lidsky MD, Duffy J, et al. Infectious arthritis. Arch Intern Med 1979; 139: 1125-1130.
19. Evanchick
CE, Davis DE, Harrington TM.
Septic arthritis. Clinical approach to the ‘hot joint’. Postgraduate Med.
1986; 79(2): 111-119.
20. Backer
DG, Schumacher HR Jr. Acute
monoarthritis. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(14): 1013-1020
21. Kolba
SK. The approach to the acute
joint and synovial fluid examination. Primary Care 1984; 11(2): 211-218.