Abstract
Objectives: To investigate
the type and degree of hearing loss in a group of patients with ocular
pseudoexfoliation.
Methods: Two
groups of patients were included prospectively in the present study. The study
group consisted of 60 patients of both genders, aged between 55 and 80 years
(mean age 67.8 years) who were identified to have pseudoexfoliation in one or both eyes on routine ophthalmic clinical
examination at Princess Haya Bent Al-Hussein Military Hospital in Aqaba. The control group consisted of 30 healthy
individuals matched for age and gender (mean age 56.9 years). All participants
underwent full ophthalmological and audiological assessments.
Results: Normal
hearing threshold levels ranging between 10-25 decibels were found in 12 (20%) patients.
Moderate sensori-neural hearing loss ranging between 50-70 decibels was found
in 15 (25%) patients, high frequency sensori-neural hearing loss in the
frequency range above 3kilohertz was found in 10 (16.7%) patients, and severe sensori-neural
hearing loss ranging between 70-95 decibels hearing level was found in 23 (38.3%)
patients.
Conclusion: There is evidence of significant association between
ocular pseudoexfoliation and sensori-neural hearing loss.
Key words: Hearing
loss, Sensori-neural, Pseudoexfoliation
JRMS
December 2010; 17(4): 15-18
Introduction
Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome has been described as a specific type of
stress-induced elastosis, elastic microfibrillopathy, associated with the
excessive production and abnormal aggregation of elastic microfibril components
which may be promoted by the deficiency of clusterin as a highly efficient
extracellular chaperone.(1)
Ocular PEX syndrome is
characterized by deposits of fibrillar extracellular material on anterior
segment structures of the eye including the zonules, anterior capsule and
trabecular meshwork, and may be associated with raised intraocular pressure in
up to 50% of affected eyes.(2)
Originally, PEX syndrome was thought to be limited to
the anterior segment of the eye, however, recent studies have demonstrated that
pseudoexfoliation material is a common age related fibrillopathy of unknown
cause and is widely distributed throughout the body, including blood vessels,
heart, and lung. These pseudoexfoliation fibers are consistently associated
with fibroblasts, collagen and elastic fibers.(3)
Patients with PEX syndrome and
glaucoma are at increased risk of carotid artery stiffness and decrease of
baroreflex sensitivity.(4)
Ocular pseudoexfoliation-like deposits have been also
found in various other organs and tissues such as liver, kidney, meninges and
skin. The correlation between glaucoma
and hearing loss has been previously studied but with the exception of normal
tension glaucoma and some congenital syndromes, no strong evidence is available
for such an association. Clinical impression described by investigators
considering the structural characteristics of hearing organs and the possible
adverse effect of abnormal deposits and/or vascular abnormalities on these
organs would not be surprising.(5)
The inner ear is a complex organ where sound waves are
translated into bioelectrical energy and afferent electrical nerve impulses.
Embryologically, the anterior segment structure of the eye as well as the
tectorial and basilar membranes in the inner ear are all derived from neural
ectoderm. Fibrils of PEX material that accumulate on lens, pupillary margin,
and other anterior segment structures can also accumulate on the tectorial and
basilar membranes as well as stria vascularis in the inner ear.(6)
Hearing loss associated with PEX has been shown in
several studies at some tested frequencies, but no studies have been carried
out to determine the type and degree of hearing loss associated with PEX at all
audiometric tested frequencies. Cahil et
al. assessed the relationship between PEX and sensori-neural hearing loss
in 69 patients with pseudoexfoliation at tested frequencies: 1, 2, and 3 kHz. They found that a large
proportion of patients with pseudoexfoliation have sensori-neural hearing loss.(2)
Similarly, Shaban and Asfour
investigated the relationship between ocular PEX and sensori-neural hearing
loss in 41 patients with PEX at three pure tone tested frequencies; they found
that the majority of patients with ocular PEX had sensori-neural hearing loss.(6)
Yazdin et al.
compared hearing threshold levels of 83 subjects with ocular PEX and compared with
83 age and gender matched controls without PEX at sound frequencies important
for speech comprehension (1,2, and 3 kHz). They concluded that hearing
threshold levels at frequencies that are important for speech comprehension are
significantly worse in individuals with ocular PEX than in matched controls.(5)
Turacli et al. investigated the possible
relationship between PEX and sensori-neural hearing loss in a group of 51
patients with PEX and 22 controls without PEX.
They found that sensori-neural hearing loss was detected in the majority
of PEX patients.(7) Aydogan et al.
tested 75 subjects with PEX with a well matched control group, performing pure
tone audiometry at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz. They found that mean
thresholds at speech frequencies and mean absolute hearing thresholds at 2, 4,
and 8 kHz were higher in PEX patients than controls; however, absolute hearing
thresholds at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz individually did not differ significantly
between cases and controls.(8)
The purpose of the present study is to determine the
type and the degree of hearing loss at all tested audiometric frequencies and
to determine which part of basilar membrane is affected.
Methods
Two groups of patients were included prospectively in
the present study. A group of 60 patients of both genders, aged between 55 -80
years (mean age 67.8 years) who were identified as having PEX in one or both
eyes in routine ophthalmic clinical examination at Princess Haya Bent
Al-Hussein Military Hospital at Aqaba, were included in the study group. The
control group consisted of 30 healthy age and gender matched individuals without
PEX (mean age 56.9 years).
Full medical history was taken from all patients, including
current or previous medical and surgical treatment for eyes and any ear, nose
and throat diseases. Exclusion criteria were
history of previous ear surgery, history of tympanic membrane perforation, history
of head trauma, history of noise exposure, or working in a noisy environment,
or repeated exposure to gun fire, use of ototoxic drugs, and concurrent upper
respiratory tract infection at time of examination. Each patient underwent a
full ocular examination including Snellen visual acuity test, slit lamp
biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, applanation tonometry, and dilated fundoscopy. After
that, all patients were referred to the Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) unit for
audiological assessment. Assessment was as follows:
1. Otoscopic examination: otoscopic
investigation of the external and middle ear was carried out on each ear of the
participants of both groups by ENT doctors to evaluate any disorders of the external and middle ear.
Table I. The distribution of PEX among
the study group (60 patients)
|
Single eye
|
Both eyes
|
Total
|
Male
|
12
|
21
|
33
|
Female
|
9
|
18
|
27
|
|
Table II. Means and Standard Deviations
of hearing threshold levels of control group (30 patients)
Frequency (Hz)
|
Mean of hearing threshold levels (dB)
|
Standard Deviation SD of Hearing threshold
levels (dB)
|
250
|
17.25
|
6.29
|
500
|
13.5
|
5.08
|
1000
|
12.4
|
4.8
|
2000
|
10.5
|
4.0
|
3000
|
10.75
|
4.16
|
4000
|
13.75
|
5.25
|
6000
|
18.25
|
3.5
|
|
Table III. The distribution of hearing
loss among 60 patients with PEX
Number of Patients
|
Degree of hearing loss
|
Type of hearing loss
|
Frequency range tested(Hz)
|
12
|
Normal hearing (10-25 dB HL)
|
No hearing loss
|
250-6000
|
15
|
Moderate
(50-70 dB HL)
|
SNHL
|
250-6000
|
10
|
HFHL
|
SNHL
|
250-6000
|
23
|
Severe HL
( 70-95 dB HL)
|
SNHL
|
250-6000
|
SNHL: Sensori-neural hearing
loss
HFHL: High frequency hearing
loss > 3 kHz
|
|
|
2. Pure tone audiometry: hearing
threshold levels measurement was done at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 kHz using air and bone conduction audiometry
to determine the type and the degree of hearing loss. All measurements were
carried out on each ear of the participants using descending of 10 dB step size
and ascending of 5 dB step size to determine the lowest hearing threshold
levels at all tested frequencies for each ear. A qualified audiologist in an
isolated test using the same clinical diagnostic audiometer for all subjects
carried out all measurements.
3. Tympanometry: test of the middle
ear function was carried out on each ear of the participants of both groups
using middle ear analyzer. The findings revealed no abnormalities that may
interfere with the accuracy of pure tone audiometry.
Results
Ophthalmological investigation:
Sixty patients with unilateral or bilateral PEX who
were attending the ophthalmic clinic at Princess Haya
Military Hospital
at Aqaba were selected randomly and enrolled in the study group during the
period January 2007 and June 2007.
Table I shows the distribution of PEX in the study
group and it shows that PEX is more frequent in males (male : female,
1.2 : 1) and both eyes (unilateral : bilateral, 1 : 1.86) are more
frequently affected in both genders.
Audiological investigation:
Otoscopic examination revealed no abnormalities in the
study group as well as in the control group.
Pure tone audiometery showed that hearing threshold
levels were within normal levels at all tested frequencies (ranged between 5-20
dB HL).
Table II shows the mean and standard deviation of hearing
threshold levels of the control group. Table III shows the degree and type of
hearing loss of 60 patients (study group).
Discussion
In the present study, there is a significantly high
prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss in patients with PEX as compared with
the age and gender matched group. This high prevalence was observed in the
majority of patients at all tested frequencies ranging between 250-6000 Hz,
which reflects the effect of PEX syndrome on all parts of the basilar membrane.
Our results are consistent with the results obtained
with Cahill et al.(2)
Yazdin et al.(5)
Shaban and Asfour,(6) Turacli et al.(7) and Aydogan et al.(8) that ocular
PEX syndrome has an association with sensori-neural hearing loss. No research
study had shown contrast to these findings.
Sensori-neural hearing
loss may be attributed to various etiologies especially
in old ages such as toxic agents, acoustic neuroma, or the aging process, however,
the exact mechanism is unknown.(3)
In the present study, all
patients with ocular PEX had various degrees of sensori-neural hearing
threshold change compared with age matched control group, so we believe that
there is an association between PEX and sensori-neural hearing loss. Structural
alteration of the tectorial and basilar membranes and stria vascularis in the inner ear by deposition of PEX fibrils may change the way in
which vibratory energy is conducted to the sensory hair cells and alter their
surrounding chemical environment resulting in sensori-neural hearing loss.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that the majority of patients with
ocular PEX had various degree of sensori-neural hearing loss. This indicates that there is an association
between hearing loss and PEX.
References
1. Zenkel
M, Kruse F, Ju¨nemann A, Naumann G, Schrehardt
U. Clusterin deficiency
in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome may be implicated
in the aggregation and deposition of pseudoexfoliative material. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47(5): 1982–1990.
2. Cahill M, Early A, Stack S,
Blayney AW, Eustace P. Pseudoexfoliation
and sensorineural hearing loss. Eye 2002; 16:261–266.
3.
Atalar P, Atalar E, Kilic H, Ozer N, et
al. Impaired Systemic
Endothelial function in Patients with Pseudoxfoliation Syndrome. Int Heart J 2006; 47(1):
77- 84.
4.
Visontai Z, Merisch B, Kollai M, Hollo G. Increase of carotid artery stiffness and
decrease of baroreflex sensitivity in exfoliation syndrome and glaucoma. Br
J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 563–567.
5. Yazdin S,
Tousi A, Pakravan M, and Faghihi A. Sensorineural Hearing Loss in
Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(3): 425- 429.
6.
Shaban RI,
Asfour WM. Ocular
pseudoexfoliation associated with hearing loss. Saudi Medical Journal
2004; Vol. 25 (9): 1254-1257.
7. Turacli ME, Ozdemir FA, Tekeli O, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss in
pseudoexfoliation. Can J Ophthalmol 2007; 42: 56–59.
8. Aydogan Ozkan B, Yuksel N, Keskin G, et al. Homocysteine levels in plasma and sensorineural
hearing loss in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol
2006; 16: 542–547.