JOURNAL OF THE
ROYAL MEDICAL SERVICES

Official Publication for the Jordanian Royal Medical Services


Citicoline in the Treatment of Essential Tremor


Ammar Mubaidin MD*, Abed-Rahim Al-Dwairi MD*, Raed Nofal MD*, Abdellatif Wreikat MD*


 ABSTRACT


Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Citicoline for the treatment of patients affected by essential tremor. 


Methods: The study was conducted in the Neurology Department at King Hussein Medical Centre. A total of 18 subjects were non-randomly selected and enrolled in the study (8 males, 10 females), with a mean age of 62.6 years. The primary outcome measure was the degree of tremor compared to baseline as measured by the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor. 


Results: The mean duration of symptoms among the study group was 6 years. All patients were evaluated at least twice, at enrollment and 8 weeks after starting treatment. The dose was 2ml twice daily (equivalent to 400mg /daily) taken orally. Seven subjects showed marked improvement on Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor. Seven subjects showed moderate improvements, and 2 subjects showed mild improvement, and two subjects showed  no  change.   The  overall  improvement  in  all  treated  subjects  was  89%  (T-Value = 8.42, P-Value = 0.000).  The main side effects encountered during the treatment period were gastrointestinal symptoms in two subjects (11%), anxiety in one subject (6%), headache in one subject (6%), dizziness in one subject (6%), and insomnia in another (6%). 


Conclusion: Citicoline significantly improved essential tremor in this small group of subjects. 


Key words: Citicoline, Essential Tremor


JRMS March 2011; 18(1): 20-25

 



Introduction


The pharmacologic therapy for essential tremor (ET) is unsatisfactory in many patients.  Citicoline is a naturally occurring compound that is essential for the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine. It also enhances the synthesis of acetylcholine and restores phospholipid content in the brain.  


ET is one of the most common movement disorders but relatively few effective and tolerable therapies are available.(1) It is a sporadic or familial disorder characterized by postural and/or kinetic tremor affecting mainly the arms, and less frequently it can affect other parts of the body such as the lower limbs, head, and voice.(2) In advanced stages, daily living activities, such as eating and writing, may become impaired.(3) Although the pathophysiological basis of ET is controversial,(4) several recent studies showed that there are identifiable structural pathological changes in ET in post mortem brains.(5-11)  These changes were either cerebellar degenerative changes, including increase numbers of torpedoes (i.e., proximal swelling of the Purkinje cell axon), with reduction in number of Purkinje cells, or the presence of Lewy bodies in the locus cereleus.(12)


ET treatment have shown limited efficacy, particularly in patients with severe and disabling symptoms. The main two drugs which have been proven equally effective in ET therapy are propranolol and primidone.(13) Several other drugs have been used with limited or short lasting efficacy.(14-21)


   Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Citicoline for the treatment of patients affected by ET at King Hussein Medical Centre. 



Methods


An open study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Citicoline for the treatment of ET in the Neurology Department at King Hussein Medical Centre between February 2009 and July 2009. We assessed a group of 18 patients (8 males, 10 females) who met the diagnostic criteria of ET as proposed by Bain et al.(22)    Females constituted 55.6% of the study group and the sample’s age ranged between 44 and 76 years (mean 62.6 years), (Table I).


Their mean duration of illness was 6 years (range 1–14 years), and 7 out of 18 (38.8%) showed positive family history associated with ET. The patients who were on specific medication for ET were stopped for two weeks before the beginning of the study.  All patients proved to have normal thyroid function tests prior to enrollment. All 18 patients had bilateral tremor in the upper extremities. None of the studied patients were taking alcohol. All patients received Citicoline in an oral dose of 2ml twice daily (equivalent to 400 mg daily) during the study period. An informed consent was obtained from all patients before the study in addition to Institutional Review Board (IRB), and Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval. 


The severity of tremor was quantified using the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST).(23) All clinical evaluations were carried out and recorded by neurologists. 


All patients were clinically evaluated at least twice, at enrollment and 8 weeks after starting treatment using the CRST. The degree and percentage of improvement on CRST was scored: no improvement, mild improvement (up to 30%), moderate improvement (31-50%), and marked improvement (above 51%) as illustrated in Table II. Simple descriptive statistics using mean and percentage was used to describe the study variables. T-test was used to determine statistically significant baseline and post treatment improvement after Citicoline treatment.



Results


Table III demonstrates that seven subjects showed marked improvement on CRST (39%), seven subjects showed moderate improvements (39%) two subjects (11%) showed mild improvement, and two subjects showed no change (11%). The overall improvement in all treated subjects was 89%.


A statistically significant difference was found for most of patients when comparing basal and post treatment evaluations (t = 8.42, P = 0.000). No statistically significant differences were found between those patients with family and those without family history in terms of response. 


Throughout the study, treatment with Citicoline showed a tolerability profile that seemed favorable in all cases, with no drop outs. Table IV presents the main side effects encountered during the treatment period which were gastrointestinal symptoms in two subjects (11%), anxiety in one subject (6%), headache in one subject (6%), dizziness in one subject (6%), and insomnia in one subject (6%).



Discussion


The last few years have seen an increase in the number of therapies studied for ET. Nevertheless, the drug treatment of ET remains poor and often unsatisfactory,(24) and most studies support, at best, a 50% reduction in tremor severity.


The report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology published in 2005:(25) recommended propranolol and primidone for limb tremor as level A; Alprazolam, Atenolol, Gabapentin, and Topiramate as level B; Clonazepam, Nadolol, clozapine, Botulinum toxin A, and Nimodipine, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Thalamotomy as level C. 


The efficacy of Primidone and b-adrenergic antagonists such as Propranolol has been demonstrated in several studies,(26-29) and considered by many as first line of treatment.(25)  Gabapentin on the other hand can be likely regarded as an appropriate treatment in ET as it has shown improvement in several studies,(30-32) and may have similar efficacy to propranolol.(30)  Several double-blind placebo controlled trials of Topiramate in ET subjects showed improvement in subjective and objective measurements of tremor corresponding to 20%–30% improvement over baseline.(33-35) Two open-label studies showed modest benefit of Zonisamide in the treatment of  ET.(36-38)  A  double-blind placebo controlled study using Pregabalin showed significant benefit in reduction of tremor amplitude.(39)



Table I: Demographic Characteristics of Patients

Subject

Gender

Age

Duration of symptoms in years

Positive Family History

1

F

72

11

 

2

M

61

4

+ve

3

F

55

12

+ve

4

F

48

3

 

5

F

57

2

+ve

6

M

59

1

 

7

M

76

5

 

8

F

44

14

+ve

9

F

66

3

 

10

F

69

5

+ve

11

M

70

1

+ve

12

M

72

6

 

13

F

76

5

 

14

M

46

7

 

15

F

64

3

 

16

M

61

12

+ve

17

M

66

9

 

18

F

65

5

 



Table II: Clinical Evaluation of Essential Tremor (ET) before and after eight weeks of treatment with Citicoline

Subject

Baseline tremor rating scale

(0-4)

Tremor rating scale at 8 weeks

(0-4)

Percentage of improvement from baseline

Degree of improvement

 

1

3

1

50

***

2

2

0

100

****

3

4

2

50

***

4

2

0

100

****

5

1

0

100

****

6

1

0

100

****

7

2

1

25

**

8

4

2

50

***

9

2

0

100

****

10

3

3

0%

*

11

2

1

50

***

12

3

1

50

***

13

3

2

25

**

14

3

3

0

*

15

2

0

100

****

16

4

1

75

****

17

3

1

50

***

18

3

1

50

***

Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST): 0= no tremor, 1= slight, may be intermittent, 2= moderate amplitude, may be intermittent, 3= marked amplitude, 4= severe amplitude

Degree of Improvement: * = no improvement, ** = mild improvement (up to 30% improvement), *** = moderate improvement (31-50% improvement), **** = marked improvement (above 51%)


Botulinum Toxin has also been studied in ET,(40-45) most studies have demonstrated mild to marked improvement over baseline in terms of clinical rating scales. 


Citicoline is a complex organic molecule that functions as an intermediate in the biosynthesis of cell membrane phospholipids. Citicoline is also known as CDP-choline and cytidine diphosphate choline (cytidine 5’-diphosphocholine).


Exogenous Citicoline is hydrolyzed in the small intestine and readily absorbed as choline and cytidine, where they enter various biosynthetic pathways that utilize Citicoline as an intermediate, and cross the blood-brain barrier for resynthesis into Citicoline in the brain. Citicoline was found to have a sparing effect on systemic choline reserves, as well as inhibiting the breakdown of membrane phospholipids.


  The brain uses choline preferentially for acetylcholine synthesis, and when the demand for acetylcholine increases or choline stores in the brain    are    low,   phospholipids   in   the   neuronal membrane can be catabolized to supply the needed choline. 


Table III: Number and percentage of improvement after receiving Citicoline among the study group

Degree of Improvement

Number of Patients

Percentage of Improvement

No Improvement

2

11

Mild Improvement

2

11

Moderate Improvement

7

39

Marked Improvement

7

39


Table IV:Side effects among the study group

 Side effect

Anx

LE

Dep

H

N, V, D

INS

EBT

ALG

UI

DIZ

1

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

*

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBT: elevated body temperature, H: headache, N, V, D: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, Anx: anxiety, Dep: depression, UI: urinary incontinence, INS: insomnia, ALG: Allergic reaction, LE: Leg Edema, DIZ: dizziness 


In an in-vitro study, Citicoline at high concentrations stimulated brain acetylcholinesterase (AChE). The postulated mechanism involves bioconversion of Citicoline to phosphatidylcholine. Experimental studies in rats found evidence that Citicoline potentiates dopamine release in the brain, presumably by stimulating release of acetylcholine.(47) As the Biochemical markers of cholinergic nerve transmission are known to be deficient in conditions characterized by degeneration of cholinergic neurons, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Citicoline was found to modestly improve cognitive function in these patients by serving as an acetylcholine precursor.


Citicoline has been used in various disorders mainly neurological, in particular stroke, brain injury, Alzheimer’s Disease, and vascular dementia. 


A study carried by Agnoli et al.  using CDP-Choline in Parkinsonian patients  based on its  intermediate action  in the phospholipid metabolic pathway to improve the functionality of the dopamine (DA) system, showed that CDP-choline significantly  improve rigidity and bradykinesia with less amelioration of tremor suggesting a possible action on the DA receptor through an activation of the phospholipid metabolism. 


In our open experimental study, we found that Citicoline is an effective drug in the control of tremor symptoms in a dose of 400mg daily. The overall improvement was in 89% in the study group, which is higher than any previous studies conducted to date to control ET. If we compare our result to Propranolol which is the only FDA approved medication for ET, we find that the mean reduction of tremor in propranolol ranged from 50-60%(25) whereas with Citicoline it reached 89%. 


The improvement was marked in 39%, moderate in 39%, and mild in 11% and in 11% showed no benefit. Although no benefit was noted clinically in two subjects (11%), the two non-responders believed that they felt subjectively better and wished to continue the treatment.



Limitation of the Study 


   Comparison of our study results regarding efficacy of Citicoline in ET treatment is different because of the study design and population selection. Further studies,   preferably    double-blind    and    placebo controlled, are needed to find out the role of Citicoline in the treatment of various types of tremor.



Conclusion


Citicoline significantly improved essential tremor in this small group of subjects.



References



1. Dogu O, Sevim S, Camdeviren H, et al. Prevalence of essential tremor: door-to-door neurologic exams in Mersin province, Turkey. Neurol 2003; 61:1804–1806.


2.  Jankovic J. Essential tremor: clinical characteristics. Neurol 2000; 54(suppl.): 21-25.


3. Koller WC, Biary N, Cone S. Disability in essential tremor: effect of treatment. Neurol 1986; 36:1001–1004.


4.Deuschl G, Elble R. The pathophysiology of essential tremor. Neurol 2000; 54(suppl.):14-20


5.Louis ED, Borden S, Moskowitz CB.  Essential tremor centralized brain repository: diagnostic validity and clinical characteristics of a highly selected group of essential tremor cases. Mov Disord  2005 Oct; 20(10):1361-1365. 


6.Louis ED, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, et al. Essential tremor associated with pathologic changes in the cerebellum. Arch Neurol 2006 Aug; 63(8):1189-1193.


7.Louis ED, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, et al. Neuropathologic findings in essential tremor. Neurology 2006 Jun 13; 66(11):1756-1759.


8.Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, et al. Neuropathological changes in essential tremor: 33 cases compared with 21 controls. Brain 2007 Dec; 130(Pt 12):3297-3307. 


9.Louis ED, Yi H, Erickson – Davis, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL. Structural study of purkinje cell axonal torpedoes in essential tremor. Neurosci Lett 2009 Feb 6;450(3):287-291


10.Axelrad JE, Louis ED, Honig LS, et al. Reduced Purkinje cell number in essential tremor: a postmortem study. Arch Neurol 2008; 65:101–107.


11.Shill HA, Adler CH, Sabbagh MN, et al. Pathologic findings in prospectively ascertained essential tremor subjects. Neurology 2008; 70: 1452-1455.


12.Louis ED, Honig LS, Vonsattel JP, et al. Essential tremor associated with focal nonnigral Lewy bodies: a clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol 2005 Jun; 62(6):1004-1007. 


13. Louis ED. Clinical practice. Essential tremor. N Engl J Med  2001; 345(12):887-891.


14. Thompson C, Lang A, Parkes JD, et al. A double-blind trial of clonazepam in benign essential tremor. Clin Neuropharmacol 1984; 7:83-88.


15. Huber S, Paulson GW. Efficacy of alprazolam for essential tremor. Neurology 1988; 38: 241-243.


16. Ondo W, Hunter C, Vuong KD, et al. Gabapentin for essential tremor: a multiple-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mov Disord 2000, 15:678-682.


17. Muenter MD, Daube JR, Caviness JN, Miller PN. Treatment of essential tremor with methazolamide. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 991-997.


18. McCarthy RH. Clozapine reduces essential tremor independent of its antipsychotic effect: a case report (letter). J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994; 14: 212-213.


19. Biary N, Bahou Y, Sofi MA, et al. The effect of nimodipine on essential tremor. Neurology 1995; 45: 1523-1525.


20. Mally J, Stone TW. The effect of theophylline on essential tremor: the possible role of GABA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1991; 39: 345-349.


21. Jankovic J, Schwartz K, Clemence W, et al. A randomized doubleblind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate botulinum toxin type A in essential tremors. Mov Disord 1996; 11: 250-256.


22. Bain P, Brin M, Deuschl G, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of essential tremor. Neurology 2000; 54(suppl.):7.


23. Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C. Clinical rating scale for tremor, in Parkinson’s disease and Movement disorders, Edited by Jankovic J, Tolosa E. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1993; pp 271-280.


24. Hubble JP, Busenbark KL, Koller WC. Essential tremor. Clin Neuropharmacol 1989; 12:453-482.


25.Zesiewicz TA, Elble R, Louis ED, et al. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: therapies for essential tremor: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2005 Jun 28; 64(12): 2008-2020. 


26. Winkler GF, Young RR. Efficacy of chronic propranolol therapy in action tremors of the familial, senile or essential varieties. N Engl J Med 1974; 290: 984-988.


27. Findley LJ, Cleeves L, Calzetti S. Primidone in essential tremor of the hands and head: double-blind controlled clinical study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985; 48: 911-915.


28. Calzetti S, Findley LJ, Perucca E, Richens A. The response of essential tremor to propranolol: evaluation of clinical variables governing its efficacy on prolonged administration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 393-398.


29. Gorman WP, Cooper R, Pocock P, Campbell MJ.  A  comparison of primidone, propranolol, and placebo in essential tremor, using quantitative analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 64-68.


30.Gironell A, Kulisevsky J, Barbanoj M, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled comparative trial of gabapentin and propranolol in essential tremor. Arch Neurol 1999 Apr; 56(4):475-480.


31.Ondo W, Hunter C, Vuong KD, Schwartz K, Jankovic J. Gabapentin for essential tremor: a multiple-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mov Disord 2000 Jul; 15(4):678-682. 


32.Pahwa R, Lyons K, Hubble JP, et al. Double-blind controlled trial of gabapentin in essential tremor. Mov Disord 1998 May; 13(3):465-467. 



33. Connor GS. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of topiramate treatment for essential tremor. Neurology 2002; 59: 132-134.


34. Ondo WG, Jankovic J, Connor GS, et al. Topiramate in essential tremor: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 2006; 66:672-677.


35. Frima N, Grunewald RA. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of topiramate in essential tremor. Clin Neuropharmacol 2006; 29: 94-96.


36. Ondo WG. Zonisamide for essential tremor. Clin Neuropharmacol 2007; 30: 345-349.


37. Handforth A, Martin FC, Kang GA, Vanek Z. Zonisamide for essential tremor: An evaluator-blinded study. Mov Disord 2009 Feb 15; 24(3):437-440.


38. Song IU, Kim JS, Lee SB, et al. Effects of zonisamide on isolated head tremor. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15: 1212-1215.


39. Zesiewicz  TA,  Ward  CL,  Hauser  RA,  et  al. A    pilot,   double-blind,   placebo-controlled   trial   of pregabalin (Lyrica) in the treatment of essential tremor. Mov Disord 2007c; 22: 1660-1663.


40. Jankovic J, Schwartz K. Botulinum toxin treatment of tremors. Neurology 1991; 41:1185-1188.


41. Trosch RM, Pullman SL. Botulinum toxin A injections for the treatment of hand tremors. Mov Disord 1994; 9: 601-609.


42. Wissel J, Masuhr F, Schelosky L, Ebersbach G, Poewe W. Quantitative assessment of botulinum toxin treatment in 43 patients with head tremor. Mov Disord 1997; 12: 722-726.


43. Pacchetti C, Mancini F, Bulgheroni M, et al. Botulinum toxin treatment for functional disability induced by essential tremor. Neurol Sci 2000; 21: 349-353.


44. Brin MF, Lyons KE, Doucette J, et al. A randomized, double masked, controlled trial of botulinum toxin type A in essential hand tremor. Neurology 2001; 56: 1523-1528.


45. Simpson DM, Blitzer A, Brashear A, et al. Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2008; 70: 1699-1706.


46. D’Orlando KJ, Sandage BW Jr. Citicoline (CDPcholine): mechanisms of action and effects in ischemic brain injury. Neurol Res 1995; 17:281-284.


47. Amenta F, Di Tullio MA, Tomassoni D. The cholinergic approach for the treatment of vascular dementia:  evidence  from  pre-clinical  and  clinical studies. Clin Exp Hypertens 2002; 24:697-713.

About
The Journal

The Journal of the Royal Medical Services (JRMS) is an open access journal and it is the official publication for the Royal Medical Services of the Jordanian Armed Forces... Read More

Subscribe to OUR
newsletter

To receive updates on new issues

JRMS Journal

Articles Archive

Archive

Previous Issues

Volume 25
April 2018

Volume 24
December 2017

Volume 24
August 2017

Volume 24
March 2017