JOURNAL OF THE
ROYAL MEDICAL SERVICES

Official Publication for the Jordanian Royal Medical Services


Suture-Related Complications after Penetrating Keratoplasty at King Hussein Medical Center


Wafa Asfour MD, FRCS*, Reham Shaban MD DRCOphth*, Suha Al-Eajailat MD*, Janet Hina MD, FRCS*


Abstract


Objective:  To study suture related complications after penetrating Keratoplasty and their role in the success of corneal graft surgery, and to define postoperative management outlines.

Methods:  The descriptive study was conducted on patients who underwent penetrating Keratoplasty at King Hussein Medical Center in Amman, Jordan between March 2005 and February 2009.  It included 75 patients, they were followed for suture related complications during their routine visits, the clinical findings recorded at follow up visits included epithelial erosions around sutures, sterile infiltrates, infectious keratitis, loose or broken sutures, and wound dehiscence after suture removal.

Results:  Spontaneous loosening or breakage of sutures occurred in 12 patients (16%), at an average of 7 months post surgery. Suture related abscesses were seen in 4 patients (5.3%) at an average of 14 months. Sterile infiltrates were seen in 10 patients (13.3%) at an average of 6 months. Suture erosions over the nylon sutures were found in 6 patients (8 %) at an average of 10 months, while four patients (5.3%) presented with broken sutures and leaking wound at an average of 10 months.

Conclusion:Proper postoperative care is important for a successful penetrating keratoplasty. Suture related complications frequently occur after penetrating keratoplasty.  Prompt and proper management is essential and will result in earlier visual rehabilitation and greater long-term graft survival.


Key words: Penetrating, Keratoplasty, Suture-related complications


JRMS March 2011; 18(1): 30-33

 



Introduction


   The outcome of corneal transplantation depends on skilled long term care.(1) The postoperative course of Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) is often complicated by suture-related problems.(2) Sutures play an important role in wound stability,(3) and their disruption can lead to significant and often unpredictable increase in corneal astigmatism.(4,5)


   Corneal ulcers, graft rejection and even endophthalmitis had all been reported following suture removal. On the other hand sutures can loosen, become exposed, and serve as nidus for infection. Retained monofilament sutures can cause foreign body sensation, corneal ulcer, tarsal and graft rejection.(6)


  Our aim is to study suture related complications following PKP and their effect on success of corneal graft surgery, and to define postoperative management outlines.

 


Methods


This descriptive study was conducted on patients who underwent PKP at King Hussein Medical Center (Royal Medical Services) in Amman, Jordan between March 2005 and February 2009. It included 75 patients, who were followed up for suture related complications during their routine visits. All surgeries were performed by three expert surgeons using the same procedure and there were no intra-operative complications.  All sutures were well buried, with a minimum follow up period of 15 months.



2011Mar_Wafa_1.png

 

The main indications for grafting were keratoconus followed by psuedophakic bullous keratopathy, herpes simplex keratitis, and corneal dystrophies (Fig. 1). 


Patient’s pre-operative information included age, sex, systemic disease, lid abnormalities, pre-existing ocular surface disease and corneal vascularization, surgical indications and preoperative medications. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years and the follow-up protocol normally included 12 scheduled examinations in the first year, and 4  examinations in the second year and 6 monthly thereafter.


The clinical findings recorded at follow up visits included epithelial defects around sutures, sterile infiltrates, infectious keratitis, loose or broken sutures, and wound dehiscence after suture removal.


Sutures were not normally removed before 12 months unless they were loose, causing irritation or severe astigmatism by topography.

 


Results


Eighty-three eyes of 75 patients were followed up for a minimum of two years.  In three patients the PKP was a redo procedure, in four patients cataract extraction was done with Intra Ocular Lens insertion in two of these patients.


An allograft reaction occurred in four patients, two of them presented with sub epithelial dots, the third had Khodadoust endothelial rejection line, while in the fourth patient the rejection was suture related; it was associated with irritating loose suture and early vascularization around the suture, however reversal of the graft rejection was possible in all four patients by increasing the regimen of topical steroid medications as well as a short course of systemic steroids.


The main indication for PKP was keratoconus (n=55), followed by psuedophakic bullous keratopathy (n=13), herpes simplex corneal opacity (n=5), and other causes (n=2) as shown in Fig. 2.

 


Table 1. Post-operative time interval of suture related complication following keratoplasty

Complication

No.

%

Average time (months)

Range (months)

Loose irritating sutures

12

16

7± 5.16

1-15

Sterile infiltrates

10

13.3

6± 2.58

2-9

Erosions

6

8

10± 4.69

2-15

Suture Abscess

4

5.33

14± 10.73

7-30

Traumatic wound dehiscence

4

5.33

10± 5.56

9-15

 


Spontaneous loosening or breakage of sutures occurred in 12 patients, two of them required re-suturing due to early wound dehiscence or manifest leakage from the wound. The average time interval between PKP and the occurrence of breakage was seven months (SD±5.16, range 1-15 months) (see Table I).


Suture related abscesses were also seen in four patients, they came complaining of pain and injected eyes. Two of them had ulcerative epithelial defects with stromal infiltrates adjacent to loose irritating sutures while the other two presented with infiltrates and hypopyon one week following selective suture removal. All patients were cultured, the results revealed Streptococcus pneumoniae in two patients, Staphylococcus aureus in one patient, and no growth in the fourth patient; this however was considered infectious because of the presence of hypopyon and good response to fortified topical antibiotic treatment. The average time between surgery and occurrence of abscesses was 14 months (SD±10.73, range 7-30 months).


Three of these patients were admitted to hospital; all were treated with daily sub-conjunctival injection of antibiotics for four days and vigorous topical fortified eye drops and responded well.


One of the patients developed endophthalmitis and received intravitreal antibiotic injection and also responded well but experienced a decrease of two lines of visual acuity.


Sterile infiltrates were found in 10 patients (13.3%), mostly as small sub-epithelial infiltrates adjacent to sutures more often on the recipient side.  All were symptom free and only were detected at routine follow up visits.  Close observation was necessary and none of them progressed to ulcers or abscesses and therefore no culture and sensitivity tests were performed.


These infiltrates were encountered at an average of 6 months post PKP (SD±2.58, range 2-9 months), most of infiltrates disappeared over the follow up course.


Suture erosions over the nylon sutures were also recorded  in  six  patients  (8%)  throughout  the post operative follow-up period at an average of 10 months (SD±4.69, range 2-15 months). Patients reported a foreign body sensation, the eroding sutures were removed and broad spectrum topical antibiotics were prescribed with close follow up and symptoms disappeared with no sequel on vision.


Three patients presented with broken sutures and leaking wound following trauma, this incidence occurred in keratoconus young patients with age range 13-18 years; however one other patient with graft following psuedophakic bullous keratopathy developed wound dehiscence following suture removal 12 months after surgery, average time from surgery was 10 months (SD±5.56, range 5-8 months).

 


Discussion


In our study, 6 patients developed suture erosions within an average time of 10 months (±4.69) post surgery, this finding was inconsistent with previous studies published by Dana et al. who reported 33 months,(7) and Siganos et al. who reported 31.6 months).(8) This finding is probably related to our policy of removing all sutures between 12-18 months post surgery; as the suture erosion tends to escalate with increased elapsed time from surgery, especially beyond the two year postoperative period.(7)


Suture abscesses occurred at an average of 10 months, this goes with average time reported by Tseng et al.(9) of 10.4 months, and 8.6 months according to Huang et al.; however suture related abscesses were reported at 21.5 months post surgery according to Leahy et al.,(11) and 27.1 months in the study conducted by Sanchez-Perez et al.(12) The micro organisms reported in the studies performed by Leahy et al.(11) and Christo et al.(2)  were similar to species found in culture results of our study.


Broken  or loose sutures in need for repair occurred only in one patient as it occurred in the early post-operative period; while the patients who presented with loose irritating sutures did not need intervention, because they occurred later in postoperative course, and the tensile strength of the wound was good.


Wound dehiscence after suture removal occurred in one patient (1.3%) while in his study Christo et al.(2) reported nine cases (2.5%). Post traumatic wound dehiscence occurred in three patients which was also reported by Lam et al.(13) they were caused by assault in two patients and due to accidental falling down in the third patient.  Wound dehiscence is a cause for concern  as corneal wounds almost never regain the original strength of the original graft even several years after meticulous repair.(13)


Corneal infiltrates were found in 13.3% of patients at an average of six months, this goes with Brady’s findings,(14) who described suture related immune infiltrates in the early post-operative period. They were multiple, mostly on host side of the graft-host interface with no overlying epithelial defect, and so they were not cultured.


It seems a good policy to remove the sutures between 12-18 months post PKP surgery, as it helps quick rehabilitation and the use of contact lenses with minimal suture related complications.  The frequency of keratoplasty suture erosions and the serious morbidity associated with them dictates that the long term retention of these sutures should be recognized as a risk factor for the development of postoperative infection.(7)


In reviewing patients included in our study, loose irritating sutures necessitating  removal and suture related infiltrates which need close follow up were the most common presenting suture related complications.  These clinical conditions should not be ignored, as delay in management may result in sight threatening complications.

 


Conclusion


Proper postoperative care is critical for successful PKP. The anticipation of post operative complication in patients is important, and preventative measures should be taken. When complications do occur, prompt and proper management is essential, this will ensure earlier visual rehabilitation and greater long-term graft survival.

 


References


1.    McNeill JI. Indications and outcomes. Cornea surgery of the cornea and conjunctiva, 2nd edition. Krachmer, Mannis, Holland, Elseviere Mosby. 2004; Volume II, Chapter117, pages1413, 1422.


2.    Christo CG, Van Rooij J, Geerards AJM, Remeijer L, Beekhuis WH. Suture related complications following Keratoplasty a 5- year retrospective study. Cornea 2001; 20(8): 816-819.


3.    Melles GRH, Binder PS. Acomparison of wound healing in sutured and unsutured corneal wounds. Arch Ophthlmol 1990; 108:1460-1469.


4.    Frueh BE, Feldman ST, Feldman RM, et al. Running nylon suture dissolution after penetrating Keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 113:406-411.


5.    Shaw EL, Brightbill FS. Suture removal. In: Corneal surgery, Theory, Technique, and Tissue. Brightbill FS ed. Boston, Mosby publication 1999; chap.19, 447-453.


6.   Weiss JL, Nelson JD, Lindstrom RL, Doughman DJ. Bactterial endophthalmitis following penetrating Keratoplasty suture removal. Cornea 1984; 5(3): 278.


7.  Dana MR, Goren MB, Gomes JAP, et al.  Suture erosion after penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea 1995; 14:243-248.


8.    Siganos CS, Solomon A, Frucht-Prey J. Microbial findings in suture erosion after penetrating Keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1997; 104:513-516.


9.    Tseng SH, Ling KC. Late microbial keratitis after corneal transplantation. Cornea 1995; 14(6): 591-594.


10.  Huang SC, Wu SC, Wu WC, Hong HL. Microbial Keratitis- a late complication of penetrating Keratoplasty. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000 May-Jun; 94(3):315-317.


11.  Leahy AB, Avery RL, Gottsch JD, Mallette RA, Stark WJ. Suture Abscesses after penetrating Keratoplasty. Cornea 1993; 12(6):489-492.


12.  Sanchez PA, Bueno LJ, Brito SC, et al. Study of infectious Keratitis in corneal graft.Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. Oct; 75(10):659-663.


13.  Lam FC, Rahman MQ, Ramaesh K. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty- a cause for concern. Eye 2007; 21:1146-1150.


14. Brady SE, Rapuano CJ, Arentsen JJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Clinical Indications for and procedures associated with penetrating Keratoplasty, 1983-1988. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108:118-122.

About
The Journal

The Journal of the Royal Medical Services (JRMS) is an open access journal and it is the official publication for the Royal Medical Services of the Jordanian Armed Forces... Read More

Subscribe to OUR
newsletter

To receive updates on new issues

JRMS Journal

Articles Archive

Archive

Previous Issues

Volume 25
April 2018

Volume 24
December 2017

Volume 24
August 2017

Volume 24
March 2017