JOURNAL OF THE
ROYAL MEDICAL SERVICES

Official Publication for the Jordanian Royal Medical Services


Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Experience at King Hussein Medical Centre


Ahmed Al-Shobaki MD*, Janet Hina MD*, Khalid Khraisat MD**, Mousa Al-Madani MD*, Issam Bataineh MD*, Mohammad Al-Hashki MD*


 

ABSTRACT


Objectives: To evaluate Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation at King Hussein Medical Center. Indications, outcomes, and complications were investigated.

Methods: The medical records of all patients who had Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant surgery at King Hussein Medical Center during the period between August 2006 and January 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.  A total of 50 cases were enrolled in this study. A specially designed medical record abstract form was used to collect the following data: type of glaucoma, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of medications, and postoperative complications. Simple descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, percentage) were used to describe the study variables

Results: The mean age of patients was 54.3 ± 2.1 years (range 1.3 to 79.9 years). Types of glaucoma included uveitic glaucoma, paediatric glaucoma, aphakic/ pseudophakic glaucoma, neo-vascular glaucoma, traumatic glaucoma and previous failed trabeculectomy. The mean follow-up duration was 16.6 ± 1.7 months (range 9.8 months to 26.1 months). The mean intraocular pressure before surgery was 28.6 mm and 14.2 mmHg after surgery. The mean number of eye drops used by patient was 3.8 ± 0.4 (range 1 to 4) and 1.1 ± 0.2 (range 0 to 3) before and after surgery respectively. Transient postoperative hypotony with shallow anterior chamber occurred in 8 patients. Encapsulated bleb occurred in 5 patients. Revision of the procedure was performed in 3 cases. Endophthalmitis was not encountered in our series.

Conclusion: Results of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation surgery at King Hussein Medical Center showed that it is safe and effective procedure for treating refractory glaucomas.

 

Key words: Ahmed valve, Encapsulated bleb, Implant and refractory glaucoma.

 

JRMS March 2012; 19(1): 20-24

 



Introduction


Glaucoma can lead to devastating visual loss if not adequately controlled.  There are cases of refractory glaucoma that do not respond to medical treatment or trabeculectomy. Examples include paediatric, uveitic, neo-vascular, traumatic, aphakic/ pseudophakic glaucoma and previous failed trabeculectomy. Glaucoma drainage implants are useful alternatives in treating refractory glaucomas.(1-5)  Among these implants is Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation.


The Ahmed glaucoma valve was introduced in 1993. It provides resistance to the aqueous outflow compared to traditional trabeculectomy. A folded silicone membrane forms the valve that opens at certain intraocular pressure level, thus draining aqueous from the anterior or posterior chamber to an extra-scleral device that maintains a fibrous bleb through which filtration can occur.(6) An advantage of this mechanism is a decrease in the reported occurrence of postoperative hypotony compared to previous implants.(7-8)  However, complications may occur such as tube obstruction by inflammatory debris, diplopia and tube erosion.(9-10) Other complications that may occur after any filtering surgery may also occur such as hyphaema, cataract, corneal decompensation, choroidal and retinal detachments and failure of the procedure.


The aim of the study was to evaluate Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation experience at King Hussein Medical Center. Indications, outcomes and complications were investigated.

 


Methods


The medical records of all patients who had Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant surgery at King Hussein Medical Center during the period between August 2006 and January 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.  A total of 50 cases were enrolled in this study. A specially designed medical record abstract form was used to collect the following data: type of glaucoma, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of medications, and postoperative complications. Simple descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, percentage) were used to describe the study variables. A total of 50 cases were enrolled in this study. Data collected included: type of glaucoma, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of medications, and postoperative complications.  Results from our data collection were compared to other studies from literature.


Ahmed Glaucoma Valve itself consists of a silicone tube with an outer diameter of 0.635 mm and an inner diameter of 0.305 mm connected to a polypropylene or silicone plate with surface area of 184 mm2. (11)


Although all surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon, patients’ examination and follow-up were performed by a team of ophthalmologists. A fornix-based conjunctival flap was performed in the supero-temporal or supero-nasal quadrant. The valved implant was irrigated by balanced salt solution through the tube using 27-gauge cannula and then was tucked posteriorly into the inter-muscular sub-Tenon’s space and sutured to sclera via 9-0 Prolene sutures through the anterior positional holes of the plate, with the anterior border placed 8 mm posterior to the limbus. The tube was cut and bevelled up to permit its extension 2 to 3mm into the anterior chamber. The anterior chamber was entered through the cauterized limbal area with a 23-gauge needle 1.5 mm posterior to the limbus and parallel to the iris plane. The tube was inserted into the anterior chamber via the needle track using special designed tube insertion forceps and secured to the sclera with a loose 10-0 Nylon suture. The tube was covered with a rectangle of preserved sclera of approximately 5x7 mm.(2) The conjunctiva was sutured back to its original position using 8-0 Vicryl sutures. Sub-conjunctival steroids and antibiotics were injected at the completion of the procedure in a quadrant away from the surgical site. Postoperative topical steroid-antibiotic and cycloplegic preparations (prednisolone acetate 1%, ofloxacin, cyclopentolate eye drops) were prescribed for the first several weeks.


 

Results


Table I summarizes the results of our study.  The mean age of patients was 54.3 ± 2.1 years (range 1.3 to 79. 9 years). Types of glaucoma included failed trabeculectomy, uveitic, aphakic/pseudophakic, neo-vascular, paediatric and traumatic glaucoma as presented in (Fig. 1).  The mean follow up duration was 16.6 ± 1.7 months (range 9.8 to 26.1 months).  The mean intraocular pressure before surgery was 28.6 mm and 14.2 mmHg after surgery (Fig. 2).  The mean number of eye drops used by patient was 3.8 ± 0.4 (range 1 to 4) and 1.1 ± 0.2 (range 0 to 3) before and after surgery respectively (Fig. 3). Transient postoperative hypotony with shallow anterior chamber occurred in 8 patients. Encapsulated bleb occurred in 4 patients. Revision of the procedure was performed in 3 cases.  Of these 3 cases, Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP) was controlled in 2 patients after revision and the other case received another implant. Endophthalmitis was not encountered in our series. Table II shows the complications that occurred in our series. Success rate was 90% and was defined by IOP between 5-21 mmHg with or without medication, no further glaucoma surgery, no devastating complications, and no loss of light perception. These four criteria were also used by Huang MC et al(13) to define success rate.


In our series, the most common indication for Ahmed implant surgery was previous failed trabeculectomy (16 eyes representing 32%) followed by uveitic (24%), aphakic/ pseudophakic (18%), neo-vascular (12%), paediatric (8%) and traumatic glaucoma (6%) (Fig. 1).

 

Table I.  Summary of the study results including demographic and clinical characteristics

Number of patients

50

Number of eyes

50

Follow up (mean and range)

16.6 months

Age range and mean

1.3-79.9 years, 54.3 years

Gender male: female

27:23

Intraocular pressure (preoperative and one year postoperative)

28.6 mmHg → 14.2 mmHg

Mean Visual acuity in Snellen’s fraction (preoperative and one year postoperative)

0.24 → 0.29

Mean number of medications (preoperative and one year postoperative)

3.8→  1.1



Table II. Complications of the procedure

 

No.

%

Transient hypotony

8

16

Progression of cataract

6

12

Encapsulated bleb

4

8

Uveitis

3

6

Choroidal detachment

5

10

Retinal detachment and loss of vision

1

2

Revision of procedure

3

6

Diplopia

1

2

Correctopia

1

2

Tube touching iris

1

2

Dellen ulcer

1

2


Discussion


Glaucoma drainage implants had been used successfully for the treatment of refractory glaucomas such as previous failed trabeculectomy, uveitic, neo-vascular, traumatic, aphakic/ pseudophakic, post penetrating keratoplasty, and paediatric glaucoma and irido-corneal endothelial syndrome. Our retrospective analysis showed high success rate for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation which was comparable to other studies in the literature.(6,12-13) The success rate of our series was 90%. Only 5 cases out of 50 showed failure. Four eyes had encapsulated bleb, 3 of them had procedure revision and the fourth eye received Diode Laser cyclophotocoagulation. The fifth case had loss of vision. This case was complicated by choroidal detachment and vitreous haemorrhage and eventually no light perception vision. All the three cases who their procedure revised showed good control in the first three months after surgery. Later on, intraocular pressure started to increase and became resistant to medications. Encapsulated bleb was seen in all patients. The types of glaucoma in those patients were pseudophakic, traumatic and neo-vascular. In order to decrease the frequency of procedure failure, local steroids were used postoperatively. Proper control of predisposing factor such as uveitis in uveitic glaucoma increased the incidence of success rate.


Figure 2 demonstrates the changes of intraocular pressure over a one year period. There was a dramatic drop of IOP in the first week postoperatively (28.6 mmHg to 11.6 mmHg) that was followed by a hypertensive phase till 3-6 months (11.6 mmHg to 18.7 mmHg), after that the IOP started to drop again (18.7 mmHg to 14.2 mmHg, Fig. 2). The number of eye drops used also showed changes similar to IOP change over a one year period (3.8 drops to 1.1 drops, Fig. 3).  In addition, the drop of mean visual acuity in the first week postoperatively may be due to hypotensive phase (Fig. 4).  Huang MC et al(13) conducted a study on 159 eyes and found a drop of IOP from 32.87 mmHg preoperatively to 15.9 mmHg postoperatively with a decrease of number of eye drops used from 2.7 to 1.1 drops and a success rate of 84%. Another study conducted by Lai and his colleagues(6) on 65 eyes showed reduction of IOP from 37 mmHg to 16.1 mmHg after Ahmed Glaucoma Valve surgery and a success rate of 73.8%. The period of transient elevation of intraocular pressure, termed the “hypertensive phase”, has been described after glaucoma drainage implant surgery, appearing approximately 4 weeks after  surgery  and  lasting  at  least  12 to 16 weeks.(14-15) The hypertensive phase may be transient in some patients. It is also claimed that its presence early in the postoperative period may be associated with an unfavourable outcome and most of these eyes may need continuing medical therapy. The hypertensive phase is thought to be more frequent with the Ahmed valve because of its reduced surface area.



Table II illustrates the complications we encountered in our patients. Transient hypotony being the most common (16%), progression of cataract occurred in 6 eyes (12%), encapsulated bleb in   8%.   Uveitis   occurred   in   3   patients;  all   of them had uveitic glaucoma. The procedure was revised in 3 patients. One patient had diplopia that was corrected by spectacles, and one patient had tube eroding the iris that did not require intervention. There was no case of tube eroding the cornea or endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis was reported to occur in 0.8% to 6.3% of patients.(16-17)



 2012Mar_ahmad_1.png


2012Mar_ahmad_2.png

 

 

Conclusion


Results for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation surgery at King Hussein Medical Center showed that it is safe and effective procedure for treating refractory glaucomas.

 

References


1.Englert JA, Freedman SF, Cox TA. The Ahmed valve in refractory paediatric glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127: 34-42.


2.Sidoti PA, Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, et al. Epithelial ingrowth and glaucoma drainage implants. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 872-875.


3.Susanna R. Partial Tenon’s capsule resection with adjunctive mitomycin C in Ahmed glaucoma valve implant surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 994-998.


4.Mata DA, Burk SE, Netland PA, et al. Management of Uveitic Glaucoma with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2168-2172.


5.Kirwan C, O’Keefe M, Lanigan B, et al.  Ahmed valve drainage implant surgery in the management of paediatric aphakic glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 855-858.


6.Lai JS, Poon AS, Chua JK, et al. Efficacy and safety of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in Chinese   eyes   with complicated glaucoma.  Br J      Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 718-721.


7.Lim KS, Allan BDS, Lloyd AW, et al. Glaucoma drainage devices; past, present, and future. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 1083-1089.


8.Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, et al. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 120:23-31.


9. Feldman RM, El-Harazi SM, Villanueva G. Valve membrane adhesion as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure. J Glaucoma 1997; 6: 10-12.


10. Khan AO, Al-Mobarak F. Complications and 2-year valve survival following Ahmed valve implantation during the first 2 years of life. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 795-798.


11. Ishida K, Mandal AK, Netland PA. Glaucoma drainage implants in pediatric patients. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 2005; 18: 431-442.


12. Tran D, Souza C, Ang M et al. Comparison of Long-Term Surgical Success of Ahmed Valve Implant versus Trabeculectomy in Open-Angle Glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;150870.


13. Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, et al. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127: 27-33.


14.Fellenbaum PS, Almeida AR, Minckler DS et al. Krupin disk implantation for complicated glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1178-1182.


15.Smith MF, Sherwood MB, McGorray SP. Comparison of the double-plate Molteno drainage implant with the Schocket procedure. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1246-1250.


16. Al-Torbak AA, Al-Shahwan S, Al-Jadaan I, et al. Endophthalmitis associated with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89 (4): 454-458.


17. Nguyen QH, Budenz DL, Parrish RK. Complications of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 571-575.

 

About
The Journal

The Journal of the Royal Medical Services (JRMS) is an open access journal and it is the official publication for the Royal Medical Services of the Jordanian Armed Forces... Read More

Subscribe to OUR
newsletter

To receive updates on new issues

JRMS Journal

Articles Archive

Archive

Previous Issues

Volume 25
April 2018

Volume 24
December 2017

Volume 24
August 2017

Volume 24
March 2017