ABSTRACT
Objective: To report the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and hormonal profile in azoospermic males referred to endocrine clinic from IVF center and urology clinic at King Hussein Medical Center.
Methods: Out of 1100 infertile males; thirty patients with azoospermia were subjected for chromosomal studies.
Results: Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 7/30 patients that constitute 23% of azoospermic group and 0.6% of the total group and almost 86% of them were Kline felter's syndrome. Hormonal profile showed a significantly higher FSH, LH and lower serum testosterone in those with chromosomal alterations versus those with azoospermia without chromosomal abnormalities.
Conclusion: The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities is high in azoospermic patients and warrant routine chromosomal investigations.
Key words: Azoospermia, Chromosomal, Infertility.
JRMS Dec 2016; 23(4):23-29/DOI:10.12816/0032197
Introduction
Azoospermia is the absence of sperms in the ejaculate with prevalence of approximately 1% of all men and in 10 to 15% of infertile males. (1)
The process of spermatogenesis requires an integrated interaction between gonadotrophic hormones Follicular Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH). Plasma testosterone hormone and germ cells in addition to various somatic cells. Defects in spermatogenesis can result from impaired secretion or action of LH, FSH and testosterone, or from intrinsic defects in spermatogenesis inside the testes.(2)
Infertility due to male factors represents around 30-40% of all cases of infertility. (3) Failed spermatogenesis makes up approximately 30% of male infertility cases. (4,5)Genetic alterations, chromosome abnormalities, and Y chromosome microdeletions constitute the most common causes of male infertility. (4,5) Chromosomal defects are present in 5-7% in men with sperm counts < 10 × 106/ml, increasing to 10 – 15% in those with azoospermia.(6)
Genetics contribute to infertility by affecting various physiological processes that include hormonal homeostasis, spermatogenesis, and sperm quality.(7)
The most common chromosomal abnormality is Klinefelter's syndrome (8) which is a genetic disorder involving germs cells from an early life (9,10) and Sertoli's and Leydig's cells from mid-puberty, (11) with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 600 males.(12)
The extrapolated statistics for Klinefelter's syndrome in Jordan is 11,222 for a population of 5.6 million in 2004. We extrapolate the world prevalence of 1:600 to our Jordanian male population to give an estimated number of patients affected by the disease. If we know that the male population is around half of the total population in Jordan , the estimated number would be 4667. Such estimate does not reflect the actual prevalence of kliefelter's syndrome in any region.(13)
Twenty five percent (25%) of Klinefelter's syndrome cases are diagnosed post pubertal with rare cases identified before onset of puberty.(14) The major clinical stigmata of Klinefelter syndrome, 47, XXY (KS) and its mosaic pattern include progressive testicular failure inducing small firm testes, androgen deficiency, gynecomastia and zoospermia.(15)
Chromosomal abnormalities could be numerical like Klinefelter's syndrome with 47 XXY or 47 XYY and structural like translocations or microdeletion in the Azoospermia factor (AZF) region of the Y chromosome.(16)
The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities and hormonal profile in a subgroup of infertile military men with azoospermia attending the infertility clinic at King Hussein Medical Center.
Methods
Our study was conducted at male infertility clinic-King Hussein Medical Center in the period between January 2009 till June 2010. One thousand and one hundred (1100) patients have attended the clinic who had been married for at least one year of unprotected sexual intercourse. Thorough history was taken and physical examination was performed. Only subjects with non obstructive azoospermia were enrolled in this study (n=30) and their identifications were based on clinical examination, hormonal investigations and sonographic imaging of testicles. There was no history of any drug ingestion for >6 months, negative history of alcohol consumption and no surgical procedures involving the reproductive system. At least two semen fluid analyses were done to confirm the presence of azoospermia. Laboratory data including FSH, LH, total Testosterone, Prolactin levels, scrotal ultrasound and semen analysis were analyzed.
The protocol of analysis of seminal fluid is based on World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 guidelines .It includes at least two samples of semen obtained at least two weeks apart.(17,18) Centrifugation of the semen sample for 15 minutes at room temperature with speed of at least 3,000 g is required to confirm the diagnosis of azoospermia.(17)
Chromosomal analyses of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were executed in all patients with azoospermia by G-banding. Normally, 30 metaphase spreads were assessed, but when a marker chromosome was observed, an additional repeat chromosomal analysis was performed. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was then performed on metaphase chromosomes to affirm the origin of the marker chromosome and excess chromosomes. FISH was carried out according to manufacturer’s recommendations using commercially available kits. At least 100 cells were examined to evaluate the number of sex chromosomes. X and Y
Chromosomes were identified by green and orange fluorescence respectively. Chromosomal study included both structural as well as numerical abnormalities.
This group of azoospermic patients was further subdivided into two groups of those with chromosomal abnormalities (AZ+) versus those who didn't harbor chromosomal abnormalities (AZ-) and were compared among them regarding age and hormonal profiles.
Statistics:
The mean ±SD were calculated using descriptive statistics, standard deviation and intergroup comparison using T-student test. P-value < 0.05 is considered as significant.
Results
The mean age (±SD) is 34.1 ± (3.8) years. The mean age of azoospermic patients with abnormal karyotyping(AZ+) is 32.4 year ±4.2 versus 34.6 year ±3.6 for those with azoospermia but normal karyotype (AZ-) (P-value =0.09) . Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 7 out of 30 azoospermic patients ; six subjects with classical chromosomal abnormalities of 47XXY confirming klinefelter's syndrome giving a prevalence of 20% and one case of structural chromosomal abnormality in the form of 46XY,inv(9)P giving a prevalence of 3.3% ; this constitutes a total prevalence of 23.3% of azoospermic group. Normal chromosomal studies were detected in 77% of azoospermic subjects (see Table I).
Hormonal profile showed a significantly higher serum LH and FSH in the (AZ +) group versus (AZ-) group. Serum testosterone level was also significantly lower in the (AZ+) subgroup. Serum Prolactin level was discovered to be higher in (AZ+) subgroup versus (AZ-) subgroup.However, its level was not statistically significant (P-value =0.057) (see Table II).
Table I: Chromosomal abnormalities detected in azoospermic patients.
Chromosomal
Abnormality
|
Azoospermia
n=30(%)
|
47XXY
|
6 (20%)
|
46XY,inv(9) p
|
1 (3%)
|
46XY
|
23(77%)
|
Discussion
This study is a unique one from Jordan as it detects chromosomal abnormalities in a group of infertile males. The occurrence of infertility is universal among different countries, regardless of their economical level.(19) The incidence of chromosomal aberrations is estimated to be 2.1 28.4% in infertile men versus 0.7 1% only in the general male population.(20)
Numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities represent a principal role in male infertility.(21) It is long-familiar that the sperm count is inversely related to the presence of chromosomal abnormalities.(22) Actually, the presence of abnormal karyotyping does not only compromise spermatogenesis but also results in the production of cytogenetically abnormal spermatozoa.(23) Even among infertile males with a normal blood karyotype, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities restricted to the germ line is 5-10% in oligozoospermic subjects and 15 20% in an azoospermic males. (24)
The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities changes in different studies from as low as 4.6% in azoospermic males in India (25) up to 35% in Ukraine.(26) Our study showed an intermediate rate of 23.3% (Table III).
Compared with other Arab countries, Yassine Naasse, et al from Morocco studied a cohort of 573 infertile males and found the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in those with non obstructive azoospermia (n=444) was 10.2% which is much less than our study. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in those with severe oligospermia was 0.35% (21) (Table III).While in a nearby country, Tunisia; Ghorbel M, et al showed a prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities of 22.2% that coincides with our results (27) (Table III).
Reviewing the literature in Arab world; Syria has recorded the highest prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in azoospermic subjects at 28.4%,(28) while the lowest prevalence was reported in Gaza strip-Palestine at 9.4% in a thesis submitted for the degree of Master of science in biological sciences by Ashraf Jaber Shaqalaih (29) (Table III).
Again a study in a different ethnic group from China on 489 azoospermic patients revealed that the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities reaching 20.86% of whom 14.9% are having klinefelter's syndrome.(30) In an another Jordanian study , the frequency of AZF microdeletions among azoospermic infertile males is 8.3% (31) that is almost similar to figures from Netherland(8.1%) (32) and China (8.6%).(33)
Hormonal profile of subjects with non obstructive azoospermia showed elevated serum levels of follicular-stimulating hormone (FSH). In a study by Schoor RA, et al showed that 89% of men with nonobstructive azoospermia had FSH levels greater than 7.6 mIU/ml that comes in accordance with our findings (34) (Table II).This study also showed a significant increase in serum levels of LH levels and reductions in serumT-Testosterone levels denoting significant testicular pathology( Table II).
Klinefelter's Syndrome (KS) is 45 times more common in infertile men than in the general male population and is the commonest numerical chromosome anomaly observed in male infertility (35) and this has been affirmed by our study where 86%of the cohort were having Klinefelter's syndrome. The classical chromosomal pattern in subjects with Klinefelter's Syndrome is 47XXY, but 15% are classified as mosaic with 46XY/47XXY.The main components of this syndrome are azoospermia, seminefrous tubular dysgenesis and elevated serum levels of gonadotrophins.(36)
Individuals with Klinefelter's Syndrome frequently experienced azoospermia in seminal fluid analysis. However, there are rare reports stating the possibility of production of normal sperm count in such subjects.(37) Oligospermia has rarely been identified in cases affected by Klinefelter’s syndrome, as the spermatogenesis was connected to the presence of normal 46, XY karyotype.(38,39)
The pathophysiologic mechanism leading to abnormal spermatogenesis in cases of KFS may result from an extra X chromosome, which affects testicular development, Leydig cell insufficiency, and regulation of apoptosis of Sertoli and Leydig cells.(40) Spermatozoa retrieved from azoospermic subjects for ICSI may give embryos with unbalanced genetic makeup and therefore an increased risk of chromosomal abnormality for the offspring(41).The presence of abnormal chromatin interferes with meiotic division is another pathophysiologic mechanism leading to abnormal sperm production.(42)
This study which is the first of its kind in Jordan looking into numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities in non obstructive azoospermic males is limited by the small number of cases. Despite that no studies or data are available in Jordan; its results should be taken into consideration in evaluating infertile males and selection whom could be suitable for assisted fertilization in future.
Table II: Hormonal profile of those with chromosomal abnormalities and azoospermia and those with normal karyotype and azoospermia.
|
Mean age(Year)
|
FSH
|
LH
|
Prolactin
|
T.Testosterone
|
Azoospermia with
Chromosomal abnormalities
N=7(AZ+)
|
32.4±4.2
|
25.3±12.8
|
19.8±6.8
|
19.5±10.4
|
286.4±89.9
|
Azoospermia with Normal
Chromosomal study
N=23(AZ-)
|
34.6±3.6
|
9.1±2.3
|
9.1±2.1
|
13.9±7.1
|
443.8±166.1
|
Total group
|
34.1±3.8
|
12.9±9.3
|
11.6±5.8
|
15.2±8.2
|
407.1±164.9
|
P-value
|
0.09
|
0.009
|
0.001
|
0.057
|
0.012
|
Table III: Review of the literature of prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in non obstructive azoospermia
Authors (Reference)
|
Country, Year
|
Chromosomal
abnormalities (%)
|
Akeel A. Yasseen ,et al
(43)
|
Iraq ,2001
|
11%
|
Punam
Nagvenkar, et al (44)
|
Mumbai,
India,2005
|
14.3%
|
Elghezal,et al.(45)
|
Tunisian,2006
|
13.5%
|
Teraporn
Vutyavanich, et al (46)
|
Thailand,2007
|
4.6%
|
Ashraf
Jaber Shaqalaih (29)
|
Gaza Strip-
Palestine,2007
|
9.4%(thesis)
|
H.
Samli, et al (47)
|
Turkey,2009
|
12%
|
Pınar Aslan
Koşar, et al (48)
|
Isparta
(South of Turkey),2009
|
5.4
%( 5/92 patients).
|
Alexander N. Yatsenko, et
al (49)
|
Texas,USA,
2010
|
13.3% (35/264)
|
Moussa Alkhalaf, et al
(50)
|
Kuwait, 2010
|
18.3%
|
Walid Al-Achkar,
et al (51)
|
Syria,2012
|
17.52% (17/97)
|
Myriam
Ghorbel, et al (27)
|
Tunisian, 2012
|
22.2%(12/54)
|
Marwan
Alhalabi, et al (28)
|
Syria, 2013
|
28.41%
|
Larysa Y.
Pylyp, et al (26)
|
Ukrainian,2013
|
35%
|
G. Sreenivasa, et al
(52)
|
Southern
India,2013
|
14.5%
|
Dana Mierla, et al
(53)
|
Romania,2014
|
5.5%(6/108)
|
Ushang V. Kate, et
al (54)
|
India,2014
|
15.4%
|
Yassine Naasse, et al
(21)
|
Morocco,2015
|
10.5%
|
Jaganathan
Suganya, et al (26)
|
India, 2015
|
*4.6 %( 7/152
azoospermic males).
**4/7:klinefelter's
syndrome
|
Conclusion
The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in azoospermic subjects in our cohort is 23%. Serum levels of LH and FSH were significantly higher and serum level of testosterone was significantly lower in azoospermic subjects with chromosomal abnormalities versus azoospermic subjects with normal karyotype. Our results strongly suggest that azoospermic patients should be karyotyped and receive counseling before they are referred for assisted reproduction techniques.
References
1.Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989; 142(1):62-5.
2.Bhasin S, Ma K, Sinha I, et al. The genetic basis of male infertility. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1998; 27: 783 – 805.
3.Tüttelmann F, Meyts E, Nieschlag E and Simoni M. Gene polymorphisms and male infertility a meta-analysis and literature review. Reprod Biomed 2007;15: 643-658.
4.McElreavey K, Ravel C, Chantot-Bastaraud S and Siffroi JP. Y chromosome variants and male reproductive function. Int J Androl 2006; 29: 298-303.
5.Stouffs K, Tournaye H, Van der Elst J, Haentjens P, et al. Do we need to search for gr/gr deletions in infertile men in a clinical setting? Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1193-1199.
6.Retief AE, Van Zyl JA, Menkveld R, et al. Chromosome studies in 496 infertile males with a sperm count below 10 million/ml. Hum Genet 1984; 66: 162 – 164.
7.O’Flynn O’Brien KL, Varghese AC, Agarwal A. The genetic causes of male factor infertility: a review. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (1):1–12.
8.Jacobs PA, Strong JA. A case of human intersexuality having a possible XXY sex-determining mechanism. Nature 1959; 183:302–303.
9.A. M. Wikstr¨om, T. Raivio, F. Hadziselimovic, et al. Klinefelter Syndrome in adolescence: onset of puberty is associated with accelerated germ cell depletion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2004; vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 2263–2270.
10.L Aksglæde, A M Wikstr¨om, E R D Meyts, L Dunkel, N E Skakkebæk, and A. Juul, “Natural history of seminiferous tubule degeneration in Klinefelter's syndrome,” Human Reproduction Update 2006; vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–48.
11.M G Bastida, R A Rey, I Bergad´a, et al. “Establishment of testicular endocrine function impairment during childhood and puberty in boys with Klinefelter syndrome,” Clinical Endocrinology 2007; vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 863–870.
12.Ferlin A, Raicu F, Gatta V, Zuccarello D, Palka G, Foresta C. Male infertility: role of genetic background. Reprod Biomed Ondine 2007; 14:734–745.
13.http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/k/klinefelter_syndrome/stats country.htm#extrapwarning.
14.Bojesen A, Juul S & Gravholt CH. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of Klinefelter syndrome: a National Registry Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2003; 88, 622–626.
15.H F Klinefelter, E C Reifenstein, F. Albright, “Syndrome characterized by gynecomastia, aspermatogenesis without a- Leydigism, and increased excretion of follicle-stimulating hormone,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1942; vol. 2, pp. 615–627.
16.S Egozcue, J Blanco, JM Vendrell, et al. Human male infertility ,Chromosome anomalies, meiotic disorders, abnormal spermatozoa and recurrent abortion; human reproduction update. 2000; vol 6 no.1pp. 93-105.
17.WHO. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen - 5th ed. 2010; Geneva: WHO Press.
18.Schlegel PN. Causes of azoospermia and their management. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16(5):561-72.
19.Azimi C, Khaleghian M, Farzanfar F. A retrospective chromosome studies among Iranian infertile women: Report of 21 years. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11(4): 315-324.
20.Vutyavanich T, Piromlertamorn W, Sirirungsi W Sirisukkasem S. Frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions and chromosomal abnormalities in infertile Thai men with oligo-zoospermia and azoospermia. Asian J Androl 2007; 9: 68 75.
21.Yassine Naasse, Hicham Charoute, Brahim El Houate, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men from Morocco; BMC Urology (2015) 15:95.
22.Lissitsina J, Mikelsaar R, Punab M. Cytogenetic analyses in infertile men. Arch Androl 2006; 52:91–5.
23.Bourrouillou G, Dastugue N, Colombies N. Chromosome studies in 952 infertile males with a sperm count below 10 million/ml. Hum Genet 1985; 71: 366±367.
24.Dada R, Gupta NP and Kucheria K. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of male infertility Y chromosome deletion during non obstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Cell Biochem Biophys 2006; 171: 171 177.
25.Jaganathan Suganya1, Smita B Kujur2, Kamala Selvaraj3, et al. Chromosomal Abnormalities in Infertile Men from Southern India; Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015; Jul, Vol-9(7): GC05-GC10.
26.Larysa Y. Pylyp , Lyudmyla O ,et al. Zukin .Chromosomal abnormalities in patients with oligozoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia; J Assist Reprod Genet (2013); 30:729–732.
27.Myriam G , Siwar G B , Fatma B A, et al. Chromosomal defects in infertile men with poor semen quality; J Assist Reprod Genet (2012); 29:451–456.
28.Marwan Alhalabi ,Mazen Kenj , Fawza Monem, et al. High prevalence of genetic abnormalities in Middle Eastern patients with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia; J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30:799–805.
29.http://library.iugaza.edu.ps/thesis/77863.pdf. Thesis. Ashraf Jaber Shaqalaih supervised by Prof. Fadel A. Sharif: Genetic Causes of Male Infertility in Gaza Strip- Palestine: A Combined Cytogenetic and Y chromosome Microdeletions Study.2007.
30.Zhou H, Zhu JW, Li HG, Tang YP. Genetic defect in Chinese azoospermic patients and their relationship with reproductive hormones. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2009; 26(4):427-30. Chinese.
31.Omar F K, Abdulfattah S F, Almuthana A. Genetic Screening for AZF Y Chromosome microdeletions in Jordanian azoospermic infertile men; Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet 2014; 5(1):47-50.
32.Dohle GR, Halley DJ, Van Hemel JO, et al. Genetic risk factors in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2002; 17; 13-16.
33.Zhang YS, Dai RL, Wang RX, et al. Analysis of Y chromosome microdeletion in 1738 infertile men from northeastern China. Urology 2013; 82: 584-588.
34.Schoor RA, Elhanbly S, Niederberger CS, Ross LS. The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol 2002; 167(1):197-200.
35.Van Assche E, Bonduelle M, Tournaye H, et al. Cytogenetics of infertile men. Hum Reprod 1996; 11 Suppl 4:124; discussion 5-6.
36.Kamischke A, Baumgardt A, Horst J , Nieschlag E. Clinical and diagnostic features of patients with suspected Klinefelter syndrome. J Androl 2003;. 24: 41-48.
37.Gonsalves J, Turek PJ, Schlegel PN, Hopps CV, et a1. (2005). Recombination in men with Klinefelter syndrome.2005; Reproduction 130: 223-229.
38.ajendra BR, Lee ML, Amorosa L, Sciorra LJ. A study of mitosis, meiosis, histology and scanning electron microscopic details of spermatogenesis in an infertile male with probable 46,XY/47,XXY germinal mosaicism. Am J Med Genet 1981; 10: 119-131.
39.Kjessler B. Meiosis and spermatogenesis in a sample of men attending infertility clinic. Monogor. Hum Genet 1966; 2: 1- 92.
40.Visootsak J and Graham JM Jr. Klinefelter syndrome and other sex chromosomal aneuploidies. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis 2006; 4: 42-46.
41.Nunziatina Burrello, Aldo E Calogero, Adele De Palma, et al. Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in patients with azoospermia; European Journal of Human Genetics (2002) 10, 362 ± 366.
42.Etem EÖ, Yüce H, Erol D, et al. Cytogenetic analysis in infertile males with sperm anomalies. Marmara Med J 2009; 22(3): 217-224.
43.Akeel A. Yasseen, MD, Aida Aunuiz, et al. Chromosome studies in male patients suffering from infertility; Saudi Medical Journal 2001; Vol. 22 (3): 223-226.
44.Punam Nagvenkar, Kundan Desai, Indira Hinduja, Kusum Zaveri. Chromosomal studies in infertile men with oligozoospermia & non-obstructive azoospermia; Indian J Med Res 122, July 2005; pp 34-42.
45.Hatem Elghezal, Samir Hidar, Rim Braham. Chromosome abnormalities in one thousand infertile males with nonobstructive sperm disorders; Fertility and Sterility 2006; Vol. 86, No. 6, December.
46.Teraporn V, Waraporn P, Wasna S, Supachai S. Frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions and chromosomal abnormalities in infertile Thai men with oligozoospermia and azoospermia; Asian J Androl 2007; Jan; 9: 68–75.
47.H. Samli, M M Samli, M. Solak N Imirzalioglu. Genetic anomalies detected in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and oligozoospermia; Archives of Andrology 2009; 52:4, 263-267.
48.Pınar A K , Nurten Ö , Alim K. Cytogenetic abnormalities detected in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia; J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27:17–21.
49.Alexander N. Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Yatsenko. Comprehensive 5-Year Study of Cytogenetic Aberrations in 668 Infertile Men; J Urol 2010; April; 183(4):1636-1642.
50.Alkhalaf M, Al-Shoumer K. Cytogenetic abnormalities and azoospermia factor (AZF) microdeletions in infertile men from Kuwait; J Mol Genet Med 2010; Vol 4, 232-234.
51.AlAchkar W, Wafa A , Moassas F. Cytogenetic abnormalities and Y-chromosome microdeletions in infertile Syrian males; Biomedical Reports 2013; 1: 275-279.
52.G. Sreenivasa, Suttur S. Malini1, Prasanna Kumari, Usha R. Dutta. Cytogenetic abnormalities in 200 male infertile cases in the southern region of India. Open Journal of Genetics 2013; 3, 33-37.
53.Mierla D, Malageanu M, Tulin R, Albu D. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile couples in Romania; BJMG 18 (1), 2015; l, 23-30.
54.Ushang V. Kate, Yamini S. Pokale, Ajinkya M. Jadhav, Suresh D. Gangane. Chromosomal Aberrations and Polymorphic Evaluation in Males with Primary Infertility from Indian Population; Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2014; Oct, Vol-8(10).