ABSTRACT
Aim: to evaluate the role of CT scan in evaluating hospitalized patients for suspected orbital cellulitis.
Method: this retrospective study was conducted at prince Rashid Bin Al Hassan Military hospital and Princess Haya Military hospital. All patients who were admitted to the hospital for suspicion of orbital cellulitis and underwent orbital and sinuses CT scan with and without contrast were included in the study. The results of the scans were recorded and analyzed. The medical records of the enrolled patients were reviewed regarding age, gender, medical treatment received and type of surgical intervention. The CT reports were analyzed regarding its effect on the management plans and were compared with other studies performed worldwide.
Results: 16 patients with a mean age of 9.3±3.2 years were enrolled in the study. 81.3% of patients were ≤ 15 years of age. Sinusitis was present in (87.5%) of patients with orbital cellulitis, while dacryocystitisand trauma were responsible for the remaining cases. ethmoiditis was the most common etiology implicated in the development of cellulitis (71.4%). Fever and lid swelling were the most common presentations of orbital cellulitis. Post-septal orbital cellulitis was the most common CT findings among patients with sinusitis based on Chandler classification (69.2%).
Conclusion: CT showed was very effective in identifying the etiology of orbital cellulitis and determining its extent. It allows accurate staging of the orbital cellulitis which will be positively reflected on the disease outcome by helping the clinician in establishing appropriate therapeutic guidelines.
Key words: computed tomography scan, orbital cellulitis.
RMS April 2020; 27(1): 10.12816/0055465
Introduction
Orbital cellulitis refers to the orbital tissue infection (1). Accurate diagnosis and effective prompt treatmentare essential before the occurrence of some life-threatening compilations like brain abscess, meningitis and cavernous sinus thrombosis (2, 3).
In addition, irreversible visual morbidity like optic nerve atrophy can be avoided by the early initiation of treatment (4).
Sinusitis remains the factor implicated in the development of orbital cellulitis. Trauma, dental abscess, peri-ocular surgeryand dacryocystitishave been also reported as the major causes of orbital cellulitis (5, 6). Thyroid eye disease, orbital pseudotumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, cavernous sinus thrombosis and Wegener granulomatosis should be excluded before the establishment of the diagnosis of orbital cellulitis (7, 8).
Medical treatments including antibioticsare the mainstay treatment option for orbital cellulitis (9). However, surgical intervention such as presence of a foreign body or in cases of subperiosteal or orbital abscess collection may be needed in few cases (10).
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the role of CT scanin patients who were admitted to the hospital for suspicion of orbital cellulitis.
Methods
This retrospective study
was conducted at Prince Rashid Bin Al Hassan Military Hospital. All patients
who were admitted to the hospital for suspicion of orbital cellulitis were
included in the study.The patients underwent orbital and sinuses
CT scan with and without contrast. The scans were performed using the GE
apparatus at 3 mm intervals. The medical records of the enrolled patients were
reviewed for their age, gender, medical treatment received, type of surgical
intervention if present, and the outcome of orbital and sinuses CT scans.
Results
The
patients (16 patients) aged between 5-28 years (mean 9.3±3.2 years) were admitted
for suspicion of orbital cellulitis between the years 2013 and 2019. (Table I) represents
the demographic features of the patients.
(Table I) represents clinical signs of the
patients at the time of admission.
Sinusitis was found in 13 patients (87.5%),
while dacryocystitis (6.25%) and
trauma (6.25%) were responsible for two cases which were in the form of preseptal
orbital cellulitis. One patient was found to have an orbital pseudotumor (idiopathicorbital inflammatorysyndrome).
In 10 patients (71.4%), ethmoiditis was the most common etiology implicated in
the development of cellulitis followed by pansinusitis and frontalmaxillary
sinusitis which was foundin 2 patients (15.4%) and one patient (7.7%) respectively.
(Table II) represents the outcome of CT
findings among patients with sinusitis based on Chandler’s classification.
Table I (Demographics of the patients includes)
Age
|
Number
|
Percentage
|
Males
|
M:F ratio
|
4-10 years
|
8
|
50.0%
|
5
|
1.7:1
|
>10-15 years
|
5
|
31.3%
|
3
|
1.5:1
|
>15 years
|
3
|
19.7%
|
1
|
2:1
|
Table I
Signs
|
Number of patients
|
Percentage (%)
|
Fever
|
12
|
67.7%
|
Lid swelling
|
6
|
37.5%
|
Limitation of EOM motility
|
2
|
12.5%
|
Exophthalmos
|
2
|
12.5%
|
Bilateral involvement
|
5
|
31.3%
|
Table II
Stage
|
Number of patients
|
Percentage (%)
|
Preseptal cellulitis
|
2
|
15.4%
|
Postseptal orbital cellulitis
|
9
|
69.2%
|
Subperiosteal abscess
|
1
|
7.7%
|
Orbital abscess
|
1
|
7.7%
|
Cavernous sinus thrombosis
|
0
|
0.0%
|
Discussion
Orbital
infections are frequently seen in clinical practice and recently showed an increasing
rate of hospital admissions (12, 13).Significant visual morbidity may occur in
10% of the cases (14).The mean age of the patients was 9.3 years which is
higher than that found in most of the studies which mainly focused on the orbital
cellulitis among children but it was comparable with other studies (15-17).
Such variation is attributed to the difference in method of the study. In the
present study, most of the cases occurred in patients of 15 years of age or
younger (81.3%) compared with patients older than 15 years of age (18.7%). Similarly,
Murphy et al. studied 19 cases of orbital cellulitis of which 15 were among
children (18).
Fever and lid swelling were the most common
presentations of orbital cellulitis. Therefore, the presence of those signs
should markedly increase the suspicion rate of orbital cellulitis. Limitation
of extraocular muscles (EOM) motility which helps a lot in differentiation
between preseptal from septal cellulitis was present among two patients. In the
remaining patients, the CT scan was needed to identify the patients with septal
cellulitis. Even in patients with decreased ocular muscle movement, CT was
needed to explore the presence of abscess collection within the orbit (19).
Bilateral cellulitis was seen in 31.3% of cases and all patients with
pansinusitis developed bilateral disease. There was no significant difference
between right and left eye involvement in unilateral cases.
Preseptal cellulitis was seen in 4 cases
(25% of patients); two of them were due to sinusitis and two cases were
attributed to non-sinusitis etiology. All cases of post septal orbital
cellulitis were secondary to sinusitis. The most common sinus implicated in the
development of orbital cellulitis was the ethmoid sinus, which is related to
its anatomical proximity to the orbit. Based on the involvement of sinusitis with
orbital cellulitis and according to the Chandler’s classification; stage 1
orbital cellulitis was seen in only15.4% of caseswhile stage 2 was the most
common form detected at a rate of 69.2% of cases. This is quite different from
most of the results reported by other studies where preseptal cellulitis was
the most common finding in patients with orbital cellulitis (20). The
explanation is that the policy in our hospital is to treat patients with
preseptal cellulitis as outpatients unless a high index of suspicion of
postseptal cellulitis is made and only hospitalized patients were enrolled in
the study. Thus, CT was very helpful in differentiating the patients with
preseptal from postseptal cellulitis when the clinical presentation failed to
do so.
Subperiosteal abscess and orbital abscess
were detected among two patients. The clinical presentation couldn’tfind any
clue for the presence of such complications except for the unsatisfactory
response to intravenous antibiotic. When those complications were confirmed by
CT, immediate surgical intervention was performed which allowed fast recovery
of the patients without any morbidity.None of the patients had cavernous sinus
thrombosis (stage 5). Nevertheless, some researchers believe that the cavernous
sinus thrombosis is a complication of intracranial involvement of the infection
rather than a complication of sinusitis (21). One patient was diagnosed to have
scleral thickening, enhancement of Tenon, enlargement of extraocular muscles
and exophthalmos and the diagnosis ofthe orbital pseudotumor was established
and the proper management of the condition was presented to the patient. Many
studies reported the efficacy of CT in evaluating the patients when found with
clinical conditions like orbital pseudotumor and rhabdomyosarcoma which may
present with a clinical picture similar to orbital cellulitis (22, 23, and 24).
Staphylococcus aureus,Streptococci
and Haemophilus influenza species
were the most common organisms responsible for the orbital cellulitis.However, the
microbiological studies are usually insufficient and have poor yield in
identifying the causative organisms and the extent of the disease unless
samples are obtained during surgical intervention for abscess drainage and functional
endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) operation (14,25). CT is superior to laboratory
studies in assessing the extent of the disease andthe lesser time consumed in
the management of those patients where no time to waste and prompt treatment is
needed before critical complications take place (26, 27). For such reasons,
microbiological studies were not used in the management of the patients with
orbital cellulitis in the present study.
Although the sample size was relatively
small, the present study elucidated the marked efficacy of orbital CT in the
management of patients with orbital cellulitis. It was found to be significant in
identifying the etiology, extent of the disease and possible associated
complication like a subperiosteal and orbital abscess. In addition, it was
capable of identifying other clinical conditions resembling orbital cellulitis but
with different treatment plans. Finally, recognizing the types and extent of
cellulitis based on CT findings will greatly help in establishing the guidelines
for management of such cases.
Conclusion
Orbital
cellulitis occurred at a higher rate among younger patients and was mostly
attributed to sinusitis. CT was significant in identifying the etiology of
orbital cellulitis and determining its extent. It allows accurate staging of
the orbital cellulitis which will be positively reflected on the disease
outcome by helping the clinician in establishing appropriate therapeutic guidelines.Serious
complications, such as cavernous sinus thrombosis,were not recognized among our
study sample.
References
1. Hegde R., Sundar G.Orbital
cellulitis- A review. Journal of ophthalmic science and research 2017;
55(3):211-219.
2. Chaudhry IA, Al-Rashed W, Arat YO.
The hot orbit: Orbital cellulitis. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol2012; 19:34-42.
3. Hornblass A, Herschorn BJ, Stern K,
Grimes C. Orbital abscess. SurvOphthalmol1984; 29:169-78.
4. Gherallag D., Quigley C., Lyons C.,
et al. Optic Neuropathy and Sinus Disease. Journal of Medical Cases, 2018;
9(1): 11-15.
5. Alsalamah AK, Alkatan HM, Al-Faky YH.
Acute dacryocystitis complicated by orbital cellulitis and loss of vision: A
case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018; 50:130-134.
6.Arora N, Juneja R, Meher R.
Complication of an Odontogenic Infection to an Orbital Abscess: The Role of a
Medical Fraudster ("Quack"). Iran J Otorhinolaryngology. 2018; 30(98):181-184.
7. Robert T, John Differential
Diagnosis of the Swollen Red Eyelid.Am Fam Physician 2015; 15;92(2):106-112.
8. Pakdaman MN, Sepahdari AR, Elkhamary
SM. Orbital inflammatory disease: Pictorial review and differential
diagnosis. World J Radiol. 2014;6(4):106-15.
9. Sullivan T, de Barra E. Diagnosis
and management of cellulitis. Clin Med (Lond). 2018; 18(2):160-163.
10. José DC. , Edwin VG, Mónica Cecilia
MU. Orbital cellulitis complicated by subperiosteal abscess due to
Streptococcus pyogenes infection.BoletínMédico Del Hospital Infantil de México
2017; 74 (2): 134-140.
11. Chandler JR, Langenbrunner DJ,
Stevens ER. The pathogenesis of of orbital complications in acute
sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 1970; 80:1414–28.
12. Fanella S, Singer A, Embree J.
Presentation and management of pediatric orbital cellulitis. Can J Infect Dis
Med Microbiol. 2011; 22(3):97-100.
13. Iftikhar M, Junaid N, Lemus M, et
al. Epidemiology of Primary Ophthalmic Inpatient Admissions in the United
States. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018;185:101-109.
14. Hamed-Azzam S, AlHashash I, Briscoe
D, Rose GE, Verity DH. Common Orbital Infections ~ State of the Art ~ Part
I. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018;13(2):175-182.
15. Lindsay RA., Weiss AH., Kelly JP, et
al.Clinical Outcomes in Children With Orbital Cellulitis and Radiographic
Globe Tenting.Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2018; 34( 4):
329–332.
16. Georgakopoulos,
C. D., Eliopoulou, M. I., Stasinos, S., et al. Periorbital and Orbital
Cellulitis: A 10-Year Review of Hospitalized Children. European Journal of
Ophthalmology 2010; 20(6): 1066–1072.
17. Ho CF1, Huang YC, Wang CJ, et al.Clinical
analysis of computed tomography-staged orbital cellulitis in children.J
Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007 Dec;40(6):518-24.
18. Murphy C, Livingstone I, Foot B, et
al. Orbital cellulitis in Scotland: current incidence, aetiology,
management and outcomes British Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;98:1575-1578.
19. Chang YS, Chen PL, Hung JH, et al.
Orbital complications of paranasal sinusitis in Taiwan, 1988 through 2015:
Acute ophthalmological manifestations, diagnosis, and management. PLOS ONE
2017; 12(10): e0184477.
20. Radovani P, Vasili D, Xhelili M,
Dervishi J. Orbital complications of sinusitis. Balkan Med J.
2013;30(2):151-4.
21. Pereira FJ,, Cruz Antonio AV.,
Anselmo-Lima WT., et al. Computed tomographic patterns of orbital
cellulitis due to sinusitis. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol.2006; 69( 4 ): 513-518.
22. Chaudhry IA, Shamsi FA, Arat YO,
Riley FC. Orbital pseudotumor: distinct diagnostic features and management.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2008;15(1):17-27.
23. Nugent RA, Rootman J, Robertson WD,
et al. American Journal of Roentgenology 1981; 137(5), 957-962.
24. Jurdy L, Merks JH, Pieters BR, et
al. Orbital rhabdomyosarcomas: A review. Saudi J Ophthalmol.
2013;27(3):167-75.
25. Danishyar A, Sergent SR. Orbital
Cellulitis. Treasure Island (FL):
StatPearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507901/.
26. Rose GE. Suspicion, speed,
sufficiency and surgery: Keys to the management of orbital infection. Orbit.
1998; 17:223–226.
27. Clary R, Weber AL, Eavey R, et al.
Orbital cellulitis with abscess formation caused by sinusitis. Ann
OtolRhinolLaryngol1988;97:211-212.